Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32421188›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2020

Clozapine Combination and Augmentation Strategies in Patients With Schizophrenia -Recommendations From an International Expert Survey Among the Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) Working Group.

Elias Wagner, John M Kane, Christoph U Correll, Oliver Howes, Dan Siskind, William G Honer, Jimmy Lee, Peter Falkai, Thomas Schneider-Axmann, Alkomiet Hasan and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07120477 (Esketamine Versus Crisis Response Planning Versus Enhanced Treatment as Usual for Suicide Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 55 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07120477 phase4suspendednot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Esketamine Versus Crisis Response Planning Versus Enhanced Treatment as Usual for Suicide Prevention: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial in a Brazilian Municipality (SAVE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2026 to 2029Enrolled468ConditionsSuicide Prevention, Ketamine, Crisis Response PlanArmsIntravenous Esketamine, Crisis Response Planning intervention (structures safety planning)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clozapine-induced Myocarditis in Korea: Analysis of a Nationwide Database and Comparison to Other Countries.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Elias WagnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
John M KaneDepartment of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY.
Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY.
Oliver HowesDepartment of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Dan SiskindDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
William G HonerDepartment of Psychiatry, Institute of Mental Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Jimmy LeeDepartment of Psychosis, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.
Peter FalkaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Thomas Schneider-AxmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Alkomiet HasanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
TRRIP Working Group
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEFeinstein Institute for Medical Research · USKing's College London · GBMetro South Health · AUNanyang Technological University · SGUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence for the management of inadequate clinical response to clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia is sparse. Accordingly, an international initiative was undertaken with the aim of developing consensus recommendations for treatment strategies for clozapine-refractory patients with schizophrenia.

methodsWe conducted an online survey among members of the Treatment Response and Resistance in Psychosis (TRRIP) working group. An agreement threshold of ≥75% (responses "agree" + "strongly agree") was set to define a first-round consensus. Questions achieving agreement or disagreement proportions of >50% in the first round, were re-presented to develop second-round final consensus recommendations.

resultsForty-four (first round) and 49 (second round) of 63 TRRIP members participated. Expert recommendations at ≥75% agreement included raising clozapine plasma levels to ≥350 ng/ml for refractory positive, negative, and mixed symptoms. Where plasma level-guided dose escalation was ineffective for persistent positive symptoms, waiting for a delayed response was recommended. For clozapine-refractory positive symptoms, combination with a second antipsychotic (amisulpride and oral aripiprazole) and augmentation with ECT achieved consensus. For negative symptoms, waiting for a delayed response was recommended, and as an intervention for clozapine-refractory negative symptoms, clozapine augmentation with an antidepressant reached consensus. For clozapine-refractory suicidality, augmentation with antidepressants or mood-stabilizers, and ECT met consensus criteria. For clozapine-refractory aggression, augmentation with a mood-stabilizer or antipsychotic medication achieved consensus. Generally, cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychosocial interventions reached consensus.

conclusionsGiven the limited evidence from randomized trials of treatment strategies for clozapine-resistant schizophrenia (CRS), this consensus-based series of recommendations provides a framework for decision making to manage this challenging clinical situation.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicAdultAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineaugmentation strategyclozapine-resistanceevidence-based psychiatryguidelinesschizophreniatreatment-resistance

Identifiers

PMID32421188
PMCPMC7846085
OpenAlexW3026738499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.