Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32421018›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology. Bioenergy2020

Spatiotemporal assessment of farm-gate production costs and economic potential of

Bingquan Zhang, Astley Hastings, John C Clifton-Brown, Dong Jiang, André P C Faaij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology. Bioenergy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Climate-smart forestry through innovative wood products and commercial afforestation and reforestation on marginal land.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The performance ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bingquan ZhangEnergy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3129-1851
Astley HastingsInstitute of Biological and Environmental Science University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK.
John C Clifton-BrownInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences (IBERS) Aberystwyth University Aberystwyth UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6477-5452
Dong JiangInstitute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4154-5969
André P C FaaijEnergy and Sustainability Research Institute Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatially explicit farm-gate production costs and the economic potential of three types of energy crops grown on available marginal land in China for 2017 and 2040 were investigated using a spatial accounting method and construction of cost-supply curves. The average farm-gate cost from all available marginal land was calculated as 32.9 CNY/GJ for

Indexed as

cost–supply curveeconomic potentialenergy cropfarm‐gate production costJatrophamarginal landMiscanthus × giganteusswitchgrass

Identifiers

PMID32421018
PMCPMC7217200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.