Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32420868›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Long-term implicit memory for sequential auditory patterns in humans.

Roberta Bianco, Peter Mc Harrison, Mingyue Hu, Cora Bolger, Samantha Picken, Marcus T Pearce, Maria Chait

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Discovery, Interruption, and Updating of Auditory Regularities in Memory: Evidence from Low-Frequency Brain Dynamics in Human MEG.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Concurrent Encoding of Sequence Predictability and Event-Evoked Prediction Error in Unfolding Auditory Patterns.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberta BiancoUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9613-8933
Peter Mc HarrisonSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-9462
Mingyue HuUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Cora BolgerUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Samantha PickenUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Marcus T PearceSchool of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Maria ChaitUCL Ear Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7808-3593
University College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P003745/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory, on multiple timescales, is critical to our ability to discover the structure of our surroundings, and efficiently interact with the environment. We combined behavioural manipulation and modelling to investigate the dynamics of memory formation for rarely reoccurring acoustic patterns. In a series of experiments, participants detected the emergence of regularly repeating patterns within rapid tone-pip sequences. Unbeknownst to them, a few patterns reoccurred every ~3 min. All sequences consisted of the same 20 frequencies and were distinguishable only by the order of tone-pips. Despite this, reoccurring patterns were associated with a rapidly growing detection-time advantage over novel patterns. This effect was implicit, robust to interference, and persisted for 7 weeks. The results implicate an interplay between short (a few seconds) and long-term (over many minutes) integration in memory formation and demonstrate the remarkable sensitivity of the human auditory system to sporadically reoccurring structure within the acoustic environment.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleMemory and Learning TestsMemory, Long-TermReaction TimeYoung Adultauditory scene analysishumanmemoryneuroscienceperceptionPPMpredictive codingsequential pattern

Identifiers

PMID32420868
PMCPMC7338054
OpenAlexW3028299949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.