Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32420850›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Helping decisions and kin recognition in long-tailed tits: is call similarity used to direct help towards kin?

Amy E Leedale, Robert F Lachlan, Elva J H Robinson, Ben J Hatchwell

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cost, risk, and avoidance of inbreeding in a cooperatively breeding bird.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Signal detection, acceptance thresholds and the evolution of animal recognition systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  10. Helping decisions and kin recognition in long-tailed tits: is call similarity used to direct help towards kin?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amy E LeedaleDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Robert F LachlanDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK.
Elva J H RobinsonDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK.
Ben J HatchwellDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Royal Holloway University of London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most cooperative breeders live in discrete family groups, but in a minority, breeding populations comprise extended social networks of conspecifics that vary in relatedness. Selection for effective kin recognition may be expected for more related individuals in such kin neighbourhoods to maximize indirect fitness. Using a long-term social pedigree, molecular genetics, field observations and acoustic analyses, we examine how vocal similarity affects helping decisions in the long-tailed tit

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationAuditory PerceptionCooperative BehaviorCuesNesting BehaviorAnimalsDecision MakingHelping BehaviorMaleSongbirdsacousticscall similaritycooperative breedingkin discriminationkin recognition

Identifiers

PMID32420850
PMCPMC7331009
OpenAlexW3024642102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.