Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32420842›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2020

Finding a signal hidden among noise: how can predators overcome camouflage strategies?

James A M Galloway, Samuel D Green, Martin Stevens, Laura A Kelley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predation via motion parallax in one of two gleaning insects.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Consciousness: its goals, its functions and the emergence of a new category of selection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A Review of Cervidae Visual Ecology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Signal detection, acceptance thresholds and the evolution of animal recognition systems.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Varying benefits of generalist and specialist camouflage in two versus four background environments.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  17. Snake markings facilitate diverse anti-predator functions depending on habitat and viewing angle.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  18. Interactions between color and gloss in iridescent camouflage.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

James A M GallowayCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter (Penryn Campus), Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.
Samuel D GreenCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter (Penryn Campus), Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.
Martin StevensCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter (Penryn Campus), Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.
Laura A KelleyCentre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter (Penryn Campus), Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L017709/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial progress has been made in the past 15 years regarding how prey use a variety of visual camouflage types to exploit both predator visual processing and cognition, including background matching, disruptive coloration, countershading and masquerade. By contrast, much less attention has been paid to how predators might overcome these defences. Such strategies include the evolution of more acute senses, the co-opting of other senses not targeted by camouflage, changes in cognition such as forming search images, and using behaviours that change the relationship between the cryptic individual and the environment or disturb prey and cause movement. Here, we evaluate the methods through which visual camouflage prevents detection and recognition, and discuss if and how predators might evolve, develop or learn counter-adaptations to overcome these. This article is part of the theme issue 'Signal detection theory in recognition systems: from evolving models to experimental tests'.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalBiological EvolutionBiological MimicryLearningPredatory BehaviorVisual PerceptionAnimalscamouflagecamouflage breakingcognitionpredator–prey interactionspredator vision

Identifiers

PMID32420842
PMCPMC7331011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.