ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2020
Coated polymeric needles for rapid and deep intradermal delivery.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Characterization of Transdermal and Topical Products using Texture Analyzer Systems.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2025Review
- Quercetin loaded polymeric dissolving microarray patches: fabrication, characterisation and evaluation.Drug delivery and translational research · 2025Article
- MAP-box: a novel, low-cost and easy-to-fabricate 3D-printed box for the storage and transportation of dissolving microneedle array patches.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Article
- Elucidating the Impact of Surfactants on the Performance of Dissolving Microneedle Array Patches.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Skin Barriers in Dermal Drug Delivery: Which Barriers Have to Be Overcome and How Can We Measure Them?Pharmaceutics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two groups of single polymeric needles (crosslinked Gantrez®S-97 and poly(ethylene glycol)) of different lengths (2 mm and 4.5 mm) with defined base widths were fabricated and tested in terms of their mechanical strength and insertion abilities using two skin models (Parafilm® and porcine skin). For the shorter needles, application of an axial force (32 N) resulted in a height reduction of approximately 80%. Nonetheless, around 80% of total needle length was successfully inserted in both skin models. Optical coherence tomography showed that base width highly impacted insertion capabilities of the longer needles as only the thicker one (0.922 mm width at base) inserted into porcine skin. Additionally, needles were coated with rhodamine B and inserted into porcine skin. In comparison to a control, penetration depth of the model drug increased 2-fold for short and 4.5-fold for long needles, respectively. Moreover, quantification across skin sections showed that shorter needles delivered 10 μg of the compound in a depth of 1.5-2.0 mm while long needles were capable of delivering 5 μg into even deeper skin layers (2.0-3.0 mm), confirming the potential of coated polymeric needles for rapid and deep intradermal delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.