Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32420413›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2020

CTPA with a conventional CT at 100 kVp vs. a spectral-detector CT at 120 kVp: Comparison of radiation exposure, diagnostic performance and image quality.

Andreas P Sauter, Nadav Shapira, Felix K Kopp, Juliane Aichele, Jannis Bodden, Andreas Knipfer, Ernst J Rummeny, Peter B Noël

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andreas P SauterTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany.
Nadav ShapiraDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Felix K KoppTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany.
Juliane AicheleTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany.
Jannis BoddenTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany.
Andreas KnipferTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany.
Ernst J RummenyTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany.
Peter B NoëlTechnical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare CT pulmonary angiographies (CTPAs) as well as phantom scans obtained at 100 kVp with a conventional CT (C-CT) to virtual monochromatic images (VMI) obtained with a spectral detector CT (SD-CT) at equivalent dose levels as well as to compare the radiation exposure of both systems. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn total, 2110 patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) were examined with both systems. For each system (C-CT and SD-CT), imaging data of 30 patients with the same mean CT dose index (4.85 mGy) was used for the reader study. C-CT was performed with 100 kVp and SD-CT was performed with 120 kVp; for SD-CT, virtual monochromatic images (VMI) with 40, 60 and 70 keV were calculated. All datasets were evaluated by three blinded radiologists regarding image quality, diagnostic confidence and diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for different iodine concentrations was evaluated in a phantom study.

resultsCNR was significantly higher with VMI at 40 keV compared to all other datasets. Subjective image quality as well as sensitivity and specificity showed the highest values with VMI at 60 keV and 70 keV. Hereby, a significant difference to 100 kVp (C-CT) was found for image quality. The highest sensitivity was found using VMI at 60 keV with a sensitivity of more than 97 % for all localizations of PE. For diagnostic confidence and subjective contrast, highest values were found with VMI at 40 keV.

conclusionHigher levels of diagnostic performance and image quality were achieved for CPTAs with SD-CT compared to C-CT given similar dose levels. In the clinical setting SD-CT may be the modality of choice as additional spectral information can be obtained.

Indexed as

BMI, body mass indexC-CT, conventional spiral CTCNR, contrast-to-noise ratioComputed tomography angiographyCT, computed tomographyCTDIVOL, volume-weighted CT dose indexCTPA, CT pulmonary angiographyDE-CT, dual-Energy CTDLP, dose length productDS-CT, dual-Source CTED, effective doseHU, Hounsfield UnitsIQ, image qualitykeV, kilo-electronvoltkVp, peak kilovoltagePatient safetyPE, pulmonary embolismPulmonary embolismRadiation exposureRadiologicROI, region of interestSD-CT, spectral-detector CTTechnologyVMI, virtual monochromatic images

Identifiers

PMID32420413
PMCPMC7215101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.