ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2020
Role of 3D printing in surgical education for robotic urology procedures.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-Dimensional-Printed Models and Shared Decision-Making: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Integrating Telemedicine, Virtual Environments, and AI in Digital Healthcare: Advances and Future Directions.Current pharmaceutical design · 2026Review
- Endoscopic simulators in benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical training: a scoping review.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Review
- Medical 3D Printing Using Material Jetting: Technology Overview, Medical Applications, and Challenges.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A pan-European survey of robotic training for gastrointestinal surgery: European Robotic Surgery Consensus (ERSC) initiative.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Understanding the Vestibular Apparatus: How 3D Models Can Improve Student Learning.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025Article
- 3D printing in medicine: bridging imaging, education, and practice.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2025Article
- Novel educational concepts in prosthetic urology.International journal of impotence research · 2024Review
- Virtual and augmented reality systems and three-dimensional printing of the renal model-novel trends to guide preoperative planning for renal cancer.Asian journal of urology · 2024Review
- Feasibility and impact of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in simulated teaching of congenital malformations.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Competency in Robotic Surgery: Standard Setting for Robotic Suturing Using Objective Assessment and Expert Evaluation.Journal of surgical education · 2024Article
- ESRU-ESU-YAU_UROTECH Survey on Urology Residents Surgical Training: Are We Ready for Simulation and a Standardized Program?European urology open science · 2024Article
- Perspectives of Medical Students and Developers Regarding Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality, and 3D Printing Technologies: Survey Study.JMIR XR and spatial computing · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a simulation training platform for the ligation of deep dorsal vein complex in radical prostatectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- [Intervention planning in modern renal surgery].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Application of preoperative 3D printing in the internal fixation of posterior rib fractures with embracing device: a cohort study.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Advancing Urology Resident Surgical Autonomy.Current urology reports · 2023Review
- Understanding tumor localization in multiparametric MRI of the prostate-effectiveness of 3D printed models.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Simulation-based prostate enucleation training: Initial experience using 3D-printed organ phantoms.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
- A review of simulation training and new 3D computer-generated synthetic organs for robotic surgery education.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the past 5 years, the body of literature surrounding the utilization of three-dimensional (3D) printing in the field of urology has grown exponentially. Incentivized by work hour restrictions, patient safety initiatives, and inspired by technical advances in biomaterials and rapid printing strategies, this emerging, and fascinating area of research has begun to make headway into clinical practice. However, concerns about cost, limited understanding of the technical processes involved, and lack of its potential uses remain barriers to its widespread adoption. We examined existing published literature on how 3D printing technologies have been utilized in the field of Urology to enhance pre-operative planning, revitalize surgical training, and modernize patient education, with particular focus on, robotic surgery. To date, 3D-printed models have been used and studied most commonly in the preoperative planning for nephron-sparing surgeries during the treatment of renal masses, where the challenges of complex renal anatomy and benefits of reducing renal ischemic injury create the most intuitive value. Prostate models are the second most common, particularly in the planning of nerve-sparing procedures. Early studies have demonstrated sufficient realism and educational effectiveness. Subsequent studies demonstrated improved surgeon confidence, operative performance, and optimized patient outcomes including high levels of patient satisfaction. Realistic, accurate, and reasonably priced models can currently be generated within hours using standard desktop 3D printers. While primarily utilized as anatomic replicas of diseased organs that restore a sense of haptic feedback lost in robotic procedures, innovations in polymers, improvements in 3D printer host and modeling software, and upgrades in printer hardware allow this technology to serve as a comprehensive, interactive, simulation platform that can be a critical surgical decision making as well as an effective teaching tool. As Urologists continue to rapidly diversify and iterate upon this adaptive modality, the benefits in patient outcomes will likely outpace the diminishing drawbacks, and we may well see the next revolution in surgical education, robotic techniques, and personalized medicine concurrently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.