ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2020
Single port robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: a case series and review.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single Port Robotic Surgery in Urology.Current urology reports · 2021Pooled it
- Feasibility and early outcomes of single-port robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit: an initial Spanish case series.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
- Single-port robotic-assisted wet colostomy after total pelvic exenteration: a feasibility video report.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Robotic Surgery in Urology: History from PROBOTSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Single-port versus multiport partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score-matched comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Robot-assisted Surgery in the Field of Urology: The Most Pioneering Approaches 2015-2023.Research and reports in urology · 2023Review
- Single Incision Robotic Cystectomy and Hybrid Orthotopic Neobladder Reconstruction: A Step by Step Description.Urology · 2021Article
- Current evidence for robotic surgery in radical cystectomy.Turkish journal of urology · 2021Review
- Robotic surgical systems in urology: What is currently available?Investigative and clinical urology · 2021Review
- Improving safety in the performance of robotic urinary diversions: a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
- Robotic Single-Port Donor Nephrectomy with the da Vinci SP® Surgical System.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The da Vinci single port surgical system (SP) is the newest iteration of robotic technology, which combines the camera and all instruments into a single port. Robotic assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal urinary diversion has classically been a difficult operation. Here we describe our technique for RARC with the SP and review our initial outcomes and data in the literature. Four patients at our institution underwent single port robotic assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit using the da Vinci SP surgical system. Operative steps were performed as described. Perioperative outcomes were reviewed. All patients successfully underwent the procedure without intraoperative complications. The average operative time was 270 minutes with an EBL of 250 cc. The average nodal harvest was 12.5. The average length of stay was 5.5 days. There was one 30-day Clavien Grade II complication and no additional 90-day complications. With our initial experience with the da Vinci surgical system, radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion can be performed safely and quickly with the right technique. Our outcomes are similar to other initially published data. Further study is necessary to determine the additional benefits and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.