ArticleTranslational andrology and urology2020
Single port robotic assisted reconstructive urologic surgery-with the da Vinci SP surgical system.
Article in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing the safety and efficacy of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted techniques in urological surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2024Pooled it
- Robotic pneumovesical vesicovaginal fistula repair using the da vinci sp system: technical feasibility and early outcomes.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- [Applying Robot-Assisted Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Technological Paradigm Innovations and Clinical Advances].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Review
- Single-port robotic ileal ureter reconstruction: feasibility, technique, and early outcomes.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Review
- Global research trends and hotspots in single-port robotic surgery in urology: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Application and research progress of single-port laparoscopy in retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Single-port robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: evaluating the Da Vinci SP system in minimally invasive urologic oncology.World journal of urology · 2025Review
- Adoption and perioperative outcomes of single-port (SP) robotic partial nephrectomy in the state of Michigan: a MUSIC-KIDNEY analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Camera Port Swapping in Transperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Feasible Alternative to the Retroperitoneal Approach for Posterior Renal Tumors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Single-Port Robotic Posterior Retroperitoneoscopic Adrenalectomy: Current Perspectives, Technical Considerations, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Performance and safety of Kangduo surgical robot versus da Vinci robotic system for urologic surgeries.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Dual robotic surgery: Da Vinci SPJournal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- A multicenter study of perioperative and functional outcomes of open vs. robot assisted uretero-enteric reimplantation after radical cystectomy.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- A multimodal virtual vision platform as a next-generation vision system for a surgical robot.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- A prospective study on single-port versus multiport patient-reported surgical outcomes.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Outcomes of single-port robotic ureteral reconstruction using the da Vinci SPInvestigative and clinical urology · 2023Article
- Single-port versus multiport partial nephrectomy: a propensity-score-matched comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Robotic surgical systems in urology: What is currently available?Investigative and clinical urology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSingle port (SP) robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery was approved by the FDA for urologic surgery and clinically available in 2018. This new robotic system enables a camera and 3 separate instruments, with fully wristed motions, to be placed through a single 25 mm port. This system was designed to perform complex surgery in narrow deep spaces making it very suitable for complex urinary tract reconstruction surgery. This paper will describe our early experience of using the SP system for several types of urinary reconstruction procedures and will present our lessons learned, surgical philosophy to using the SP and early data. As with all new technologies, there is an associated learning curve and nuances to be discovered and overcome.
methodsThe da Vinici SP™ surgical system was acquired and delivered to at our institution in January 2019. Five high volume robotic urologic surgeons at our institutions underwent certification with the da Vinci SP™ and have been adding this technology into their armamentarium. Almost all cases were recorded for quality improvement initiatives and evaluated with the goal of creating standard operating procedures in terms of access, steps of procedure and minimizing pit falls. Data from all patients undergoing SP urinary tract reconstruction that were entered into our prospective institutional database were reported.
resultsFrom 1/2019 to 8/2019 we have performed 71 urologic SP cases with the SP of which 18 were for urinary tract reconstructive procedures. These cases included 15 pyeloplasties, 1 buccal mucosa ureteroplasty, 1 ureteral implant and 1 repair of vesico-vaginal fistula. This paper outlines our standard operating procedures for table positioning, port placement, access and surgical steps for these complex SP cases. Our early data suggests that use of the SP system for urinary reconstruction is safe and reproducible.
conclusionsThe SP robotic surgical system has the potential to be used for nearly all robotic urologic reconstructive procedures. Advantages include a superior cosmetic result and ability to access all surgical quadrants without re-docking or repositioning. Limitations include no near infrared fluorescence imaging, smaller working space and slightly increased difficulty with retraction. We believe these obstacles will be overcome with time and experience. The da Vinci SP™ surgical system, in our initial experience, appears to be as safe and effective as its multiport counterpart for reconstructive surgeries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.