Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32419979›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Accuracy of

Maija Radzina, Mara Tirane, Lilita Roznere, Liene Zemniece, Laura Dronka, Marika Kalnina, Edgars Mamis, Juergen Biederer, Vilnis Lietuvietis, Arvis Freimanis and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Assessing the effectiveness of MRI,Polish journal of radiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Hybrid imaging with [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maija RadzinaRiga Stradins University, Radiology Research Laboratory Riga, Latvia.
Mara TiraneRiga Stradins University, Radiology Research Laboratory Riga, Latvia.
Lilita RoznereRiga Stradins University, Radiology Research Laboratory Riga, Latvia.
Liene ZemnieceRiga Stradins University, Radiology Research Laboratory Riga, Latvia.
Laura DronkaRiga Stradins University, Radiology Research Laboratory Riga, Latvia.
Marika KalninaRiga Stradins University Nuclear Medicine Clinic Riga, Latvia.
Edgars MamisRiga Stradins University Nuclear Medicine Clinic Riga, Latvia.
Juergen BiedererUniversity of Latvia Riga, Latvia.
Vilnis LietuvietisCenter of Urology, Riga East University Hospital Riga, Latvia.
Arvis FreimanisCenter of Urology, Riga East University Hospital Riga, Latvia.
Egils VjatersCenter of Urology, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital Riga, Latvia.
University of Latvia · LV

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomical and functional imaging plays a decisive role for detection and staging, of prostate cancer both primarily and post-treatment. While multiparametric MRI offers anatomic imaging with excellent soft tissue contrast, hybrid imaging based on positron emission tomography in combination with computed tomography (PET/CT) contributes functional imaging capacities. Since

Indexed as

68Ga-PSMAMRIprostate cancerPSMA-PET/CTrecurrencerestaging

Identifiers

PMID32419979
PMCPMC7218697
OpenAlexW3027582880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.