ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2020
Patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopy: informing the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREM™.
Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07506642 (Patient-Reported Experience Measures Of EUS-Guided Versus Percutaneous Liver Biopsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Patient-Reported Experience Measures Of EUS-Guided Versus Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Using a dark logic model to explore adverse effects in audit and feedback: a qualitative study of gaming in colonoscopy.BMJ quality & safety · 2022Trial
- Factors influencing the patient experience of gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound: a Swedish cross-sectional study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Use of patient-reported experience and outcome measures within the colorectal cancer care continuum: a scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2025Article
- Patient experience of colon capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a structured, comparative patient survey.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Article
- 'This has given me the peace of mind I needed': ethnographic insights into Barrett's oesophagus screening using the capsule sponge test.Journal of medical ethics · 2025Article
- Article
- Patient preferences for the diagnosis of coeliac disease: A discrete choice experiment.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
- Bowel preparation experiences and needs before follow-up colonoscopy in older adult postoperative colorectal cancer patients: A qualitative study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Development and content validity testing of a colonoscopy-specific patient-reported experience measure: the Patient Experience Colonoscopy Scale (PECS).Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Article
- Article
- Patient experiences of Cytosponge: a qualitative study.Frontline gastroenterology · 2024Article
- The performance of FIT-based and other risk prediction models for colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic patients: a systematic review.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Review
- Measuring patient experience of Cytosponge using the Newcastle ENDOPREM.Frontline gastroenterology · 2023Article
- The COLO-COHORT (Colorectal Cancer Cohort) study: Protocol for a multi-centre, observational research study and development of a consent-for-contact research platform.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022Article
- Trial protocol for COLO-DETECT: A randomized controlled trial of lesion detection comparing colonoscopy assisted by the GI Genius™ artificial intelligence endoscopy module with standard colonoscopy.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022Article
- Comparison of patient tolerance and acceptability of magnet-controlled capsule endoscopy and flexible endoscopy in the investigation of dyspepsia.Endoscopy international open · 2022Article
- Patient Reported Experience Measure in Endoscopic Ultrasonography: The PREUS Study Protocol.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2022Article
- Patient-Reported Experience Measures for Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ethnography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring patient experience is important for evaluating the quality of patient care, identifying aspects requiring improvement and optimising patient outcomes. Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) should, ideally, be patient derived, however no such PREMs for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy exist. This study explored the experiences of patients undergoing GI endoscopy and CT colonography (CTC) in order to: identify aspects of care important to them; determine whether the same themes are relevant across investigative modalities; develop the framework for a GI endoscopy PREM.
methodsPatients aged ≥18 years who had undergone oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD), colonoscopy or CTC for symptoms or surveillance (but not within the national bowel cancer screening programme) in one hospital were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Recruitment continued until data saturation. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken.
results35 patients were interviewed (15 OGD, 10 colonoscopy, 10 CTC). Most patients described their experience chronologically, and five 'procedural stages' were evident: before attending for the test; preparing for the test; at the hospital, before the test; during the test; after the test. Six themes were identified: anxiety; expectations; choice & control; communication & information; comfort; embarrassment & dignity. These were present for all three procedures but not all procedure stages. Some themes were inter-related (eg, expectations & anxiety; communication & anxiety).
conclusionWe identified six key themes encapsulating patient experience of GI procedures and these themes were evident for all procedures and across multiple procedure stages. These findings will be used to inform the development of the Newcastle ENDOPREM™.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.