ArticleMaedica2020
Monochorionic vs Dichorionic Twins: Kanet Test vs Postnatal Neurodevelopment.
Article in Maedica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vitamin D status in women with dichorionic twin pregnancies and their neonates: a pilot study in China.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The twin pregnancy is a risk pregnancy, being associated with a series of fetal and neonatal complications when compared to singleton pregnancies. Ultrasound assessment of the fetal brain is mandatory in the prenatal screening for fetal, congenital and acquired anomalies. Fetal neurosonography is useful in the prenatal diagnosis of cerebral anomalies, combining ultrasonography with fetal ultrasound. In this study, we assessed the Kanet score in two populations of pregnant women with dichorionic twin pregnancies (DC twin) (n=67) and monochorionic twin pregnancies (MC twin) (n=24). In the two groups we included pregnancies with normal fetal growth and pregnancies with discordant fetal growth (DC twin) and selective intrauterine reatriction (MC twin). For both groups, we assessed the antenatal Kanet score during three visits and compared the results with the neurodevelopment immediately after birth up to the two-year-old children. The calculation of the average values of the Kanet score for dichorionic pregnancies revealed normal, maximal average values at all three visits, for all fetuses, no matter if they had normal growth or discordant growth. At the first and third visit, we observed statistically significant differences between the average Kanet scores in DC twins with discordant growth
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.