Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32419725›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2020

Carotid Revascularization: Current Practice and Future Directions.

Jacob H Bagley, Ryan Priest

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06721338 (Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Utilizing Reversal Flow), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06721338 phase1terminatednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of Mechanical Thrombectomy Utilizing Reversal Flow

TypeinterventionalSponsorMediSys Health NetworkRan2025 to 2025Enrolled3ConditionsStroke, Large Vessel OcclusionArmsMechanical thrombectomy via blood flow reversal using BOBBY balloon guide catheter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob H BagleyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Ryan PriestDotter Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carotid stenosis is responsible for approximately 15% of ischemic strokes. Carotid revascularization significantly decreases patients' stroke risk. Carotid endarterectomy has first-line therapy for moderate-to-severe carotid stenosis after a series of pivotal randomized controlled trials were published almost 30 years ago. Revascularization with carotid stenting has become a popular and effective alternative in a select subpopulation of patients. We review the current state of the literature regarding revascularization indications, patient selection, advantages of each revascularization approach, timing of intervention, and emerging interventional techniques, such as transcarotid artery revascularization.

Indexed as

carotid endarterectomycarotid revascularizationcarotid stenosiscarotid stentinterventional radiologytranscarotid artery revascularization

Identifiers

PMID32419725
PMCPMC7224973
OpenAlexW3024306486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.