ArticleEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care2021
Clinical outcome following late reperfusion with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- The impact of primary percutaneous coronary intervention timing on prognosis in STEMI patients.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Effective Factors in the Prognosis of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Transferred by Emergency Medical Services and Self-Referred Patients in Tehran.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2026Article
- The Irreversible March of Time: Ischemic Delay and Impact on Outcomes in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Occupational status and outcomes in acute myocardial infarction: a prospective cohort study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Melt electrowritten medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoate cardiac patches for Post-MI cardiac regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Symptom-to-balloon time and risk of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: The VERY-STEMI study.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2024Article
- Don't go breakin' my heart: cardioprotective alterations to the mechanical and structural properties of reperfused myocardium during post-infarction inflammation.Biophysical reviews · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUp to 40% of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) present later than 12 hours after symptom onset. However, data on clinical outcomes in STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention 12 or more hours after symptom onset are non-existent. We evaluated the association between primary percutaneous coronary intervention performed later than 12 hours after symptom onset and clinical outcomes in a large all-comer contemporary STEMI cohort.
methodsAll STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention in eastern Denmark from November 2009 to November 2016 were included and stratified by timing of the percutaneous coronary intervention. The combined clinical endpoint of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for heart failure was identified from nationwide Danish registries.
resultsWe included 6674 patients: 6108 (92%) were treated less than 12 hours and 566 (8%) were treated 12 or more hours after symptom onset. During a median follow-up period of 3.8 (interquartile range 2.3-5.6) years, 30-day, one-year and long-term cumulative rates of the combined endpoint were 11%, 17% and 25% in patients treated 12 or fewer hours and 21%, 29% and 37% in patients treated more than 12 hours (
conclusionsIncreasing duration from symptom onset to primary percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with an increased risk of an adverse clinical outcome in patients with STEMI, especially when the delay exceeded 12 hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.