ArticleAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2020
Transportation of patients with severe respiratory failure on ECMO support. Four-year experience of a single ECMO center.
Article in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traumatic cervical tracheal trunk complete rupture combined with cardiac arrest: A case report.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2025Article
- Utilisation and outcomes of a mobile (ambulance and air transport) venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) program in Poland during the COVID-19 pandemic - a retrospective, two-centres, case-series study.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2024Article
- Admission Lactate Concentration, Base Excess, and Alactic Base Excess Predict the 28-Day Inward Mortality in Shock Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality despite advances in the field of critical care, including growing implementation of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) support. The primary aim of this study was to present complications during transport on V-V ECMO support from regional hospitals to a tertiary center. The secondary goal was to identify initial laboratory and demographic data differentiating survivors and non-survivors.
methodsThis was a retrospective, single-center, case-series study. We extracted data from the hospital's ECMO database from March 2016 to June 2019. Patients' diagnosis at admission, baseline demographics, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and the Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) scoring systems, laboratory parameters at admission, duration of ECMO therapy and mechanical ventilation time, and the patient survival rate until the ICU discharge were analyzed.
resultsWe assessed 31 patients retrieved from regional intensive care units. All analyzed transports on V-V ECMO were performed by an ambulance and median distance and transport time were 100 kilometers and 70 minutes, respectively. Minor complications during the transport were reported in 10 cases (32.25%). The mean V-V ECMO support time was 6.56 days and survival rate until the patient discharge was 64.51%. We found higher body mass index (33.5 vs. 26.5, P = 0.00251) and lower serum lactate level (1.25 vs. 1.6, P = 0.0058) at V-V ECMO initiation to correlate with higher survival rates.
conclusionsThe transport of patients on V-V ECMO support appears to be safe and feasible. Further studies are needed to identify the specific clinical conditions which might affect the final outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.