Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32419308›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2021

Microtopographical patterns promote different responses in fibroblasts and Schwann cells: A possible feature for neural implants.

Sahba Mobini, Cary A Kuliasha, Zachary A Siders, Nicole A Bohmann, Syed-Mustafa Jamal, Jack W Judy, Christine E Schmidt, Anthony B Brennan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Engineering Multi-Scale Organization for Biotic and Organic Abiotic Electroactive Systems.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation and Comparison of the Effects of Mature Silkworm (Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sahba MobiniCrayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Cary A KuliashaNanoscience Institute for Medical and Engineering Technology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Zachary A SidersFisheries and Aquatic Sciences Program, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Nicole A BohmannCrayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Syed-Mustafa JamalCrayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Jack W JudyNanoscience Institute for Medical and Engineering Technology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Christine E SchmidtCrayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Anthony B BrennanCrayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
University of Florida · USCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa · ES

Funding

The Tissue-Engineered Electronic Nerve Interface (TEENI)R01NS111518 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI JUDY, JACK W · 2019 to 2022
$2.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The chronic reliability of bioelectronic neural interfaces has been challenged by foreign body reactions (FBRs) resulting in fibrotic encapsulation and poor integration with neural tissue. Engineered microtopographies could alleviate these challenges by manipulating cellular responses to the implanted device. Parallel microchannels have been shown to modulate neuronal cell alignment and axonal growth, and Sharklet™ microtopographies of targeted feature sizes can modulate bio-adhesion of an array of bacteria, marine organisms, and epithelial cells due to their unique geometry. We hypothesized that a Sharklet™ micropattern could be identified that inhibited fibroblasts partially responsible for FBR while promoting Schwann cell proliferation and alignment. in vitro cell assays were used to screen the effect of Sharklet™ and channel micropatterns of varying dimensions from 2 to 20 μm on fibroblast and Schwann cell metrics (e.g., morphology/alignment, nuclei count, metabolic activity), and a hierarchical analysis of variance was used to compare treatments. In general, Schwann cells were found to be more metabolically active and aligned than fibroblasts when compared between the same pattern. 20 μm wide channels spaced 2 μm apart were found to promote Schwann cell attachment and alignment while simultaneously inhibiting fibroblasts and warrant further in vivo study on neural interface devices. No statistically significant trends between cellular responses and geometrical parameters were identified because mammalian cells can change their morphology dependent on their environment in a manner dissimilar to bacteria. Our results showed although surface patterning is a strong physical tool for modulating cell behavior, responses to micropatterns are highly dependent on the cell type.

Indexed as

Neural ProsthesesAnimalsAxonsBacterial AdhesionCell AdhesionCell LineCell ProliferationCytoskeletonEquipment DesignFibroblastsNerve RegenerationRatsSchwann Cellsfibroblastsforeign body reactionin vitromicrochannelmicrotopographyneural interfacesSchwann cellsSharklet™

Identifiers

PMID32419308
PMCPMC8059778
OpenAlexW3026646312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.