Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32419285›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2020

Predictors of women's sexual outcomes after implant-based breast reconstruction.

Tim C van de Grift, Marc A M Mureau, Vera N Negenborn, Rieky E G Dikmans, Mark-Bram Bouman, Margriet G Mullender

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reduction mammoplasty, self-esteem, and sexual desire: A pre-post intervention study.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tim C van de GriftDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4382-7000
Marc A M MureauDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Vera N NegenbornDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rieky E G DikmansAmsterdam Public Health Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark-Bram BoumanDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Margriet G MullenderDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center (VUmc), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Public Health Service of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough breast reconstruction has become an important treatment modality following mastectomy, few studies assessed predictors of postoperative sexual outcomes after breast reconstruction. Therefore, we aimed to study three sexual outcomes following implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), and associate multiple biopsychosocial factors with these outcomes.

methodsData collection was part of a multicenter prospective study on IBBR. A predictive model was tested including medical, background and psychological predictors, partner relationship factors and physical sexual function. Data collection included clinical and questionnaire data (preoperatively and 1 year following reconstruction) using the BREAST-Q Sexual well-being scale (BQ5), and questions regarding sexual dysfunction and sexual satisfaction questions (Female Sexual Function Index).

resultsThe study sample consisted of 88 women who underwent mastectomy and IBBR. Mean postoperative BQ5 scores were lower than before surgery (M = 58 [SD = 18] vs 65 [SD = 20]; P = .01, Wilks' Lamdba = .88). Sexual dysfunctions were related strongest to orgasm inability and vaginal lubrication issues. The tested models predicted 37%-46% of the sexual outcomes: sexual outcomes were mostly predicted by psychosocial well-being, physical sexual function and partner support. Preoperative sexual and psychosocial well-being were positively associated with postoperative sexual well-being (r = 0.45 and r = 0.47).

conclusionsAlthough moderately positive sexual outcomes were reported after IBBR, some women reported issues with vaginal lubrication, breast sensation and orgasm. Sexual dysfunctions were predicted by vaginal lubrication and medical treatments, while sexual well-being and satisfaction were more predicted by psychosocial well-being and partner support. We advocate supportive care that includes partners and psychosocial functioning to optimize sexual outcomes after IBBR.

Indexed as

AdultBreast ImplantationBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomyMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexual Dysfunctions, PsychologicalSexual PartnersSurveys and Questionnairesbreast neoplasmscancermammoplastyoncologyorgasmsexual behaviorsexual dysfunctionssocial support

Identifiers

PMID32419285
PMCPMC7496883
OpenAlexW3027828508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.