Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32419243›Full record

Observational studyPsycho-oncology2020

In-home conversations of couples with advanced cancer: Support has its costs.

Maija Reblin, Amy K Otto, Dana Ketcher, Susan T Vadaparampil, Lee Ellington, Richard E Heyman

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Psycho-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Quality of Life in Caregivers of Cancer Patients: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Care provided by older adult caregivers to a spouse in active cancer treatment: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maija ReblinDepartment Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-465X
Amy K OttoDepartment Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3712-6435
Dana KetcherDepartment Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Susan T VadaparampilDepartment Health Outcomes & Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Lee EllingtonCollege of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Richard E HeymanFaculty of Health, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USNew York University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Behavioral Oncology Education & Career DevelopmentT32CA090314 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI Vani N Simmons, SUSAN T VADAPARAMPIL · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS 5T32CA090314-16NCI NIH HHS T32 CA090314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of this study was to describe the quality of naturalistic communication between patients with advanced cancer and their spouse caregivers using observational methods. We also assessed the association between patient and caregiver communication behaviors and psychological and physical health using the actor-partner interdependence model.

methodsData on 81 dyads were gathered as part of a prospective observational study. Patients with advanced cancer and their spouse caregivers completed demographic, physical health, and emotional well-being questionnaires. Cancer and relationship communication captured in "day-in-the-life" audio recordings were coded using Gottman's Turning System to assess the quality of bids for attention and responses.

resultsBids for attention were most often informational (Low Bids) and responses were mostly positive and effortful (Turn Towards); patients and caregivers did not significantly differ in communication behavior. More effortful bids for attention (High Bids) were associated with more positive and effortful responses. Patient communication behaviors were significantly associated with caregiver emotional well-being, whereas caregiver communication behaviors were significantly associated with their own emotional well-being and patient physical health.

conclusionsWhile patients may benefit from caregivers' more positive and engaged communication at home, the emotional labor of focusing on and engaging the patient may take a toll on caregivers' own well-being. This work contributes to the understanding of what everyday communication looks like for patients with advanced cancer and their spouse caregivers and how this communication may impact physical and psychological health. Our findings provide a foundation to develop guidelines for psychosocial couple-based interventions.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSelf ConceptSocial SupportSpousesbehavior observationcancercaregiverscommunicationcouplesnaturalistic studyoncologyquality of life

Identifiers

PMID32419243
PMCPMC8080249
OpenAlexW3026580379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.