Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32419119›Full record

Trial reportPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2020

The Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of a Parenting Intervention Integrated with Primary Health Care on Early Childhood Development: a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Huifeng Shi, Xuejun Li, Hai Fang, Jingxu Zhang, Xiaoli Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Does premature birth affect Brazilian parents' practices related to infant positioning?Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huifeng ShiDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xuejun LiBeijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, 168 Litang Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102218, China. lixuejun0627@163.com.
Hai FangChina Center for Health Development Studies (CCHDS), Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jingxu ZhangDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xiaoli WangDepartment of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China. xlwang@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing countries require interventions that can sustainably improve early childhood development (ECD) at scale because hundreds of millions of children are at risk of poor development. This study examined the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a parenting intervention integrated with primary health care in terms of ECD. A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in 20 urban communities in China, with 82 and 86 children aged 1-2 months enrolled in the intervention and control groups, respectively, and 71 and 69 children, respectively, followed to 14 months of age. All children in both groups received routine primary health care services. Intervention caregivers received a parenting pamphlet and two parenting training sessions during well-child clinic visits; those with children with suspected developmental delay received additional parenting guidance by telephone. Compared with controls, children receiving the intervention had similar developmental outcomes, measured with the Chinese version of the Ages & Stages Questionnaires third edition (ASQ-C), at baseline, but had significantly higher communication (adjusted mean difference = 0.26; 95% CI 0.03, 0.51), fine motor (adjusted mean difference = 0.19; 95% CI 0.01, 0.37), and overall (adjusted mean difference = 0.25; 95% CI 0.10, 0.41) ASQ-C z-scores after 12 months of the intervention. The intervention cost per child was $50.87, and the costs for increasing the communication, fine motor, and overall ASQ-C scores by one SD were $195.65, $267.74, and $203.48, respectively. Our findings indicate that the integration of a parenting intervention with existing primary health care is a cost-effective way to improve ECD.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedParentingPrimary Health CareChinaCluster AnalysisCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth PromotionHumansInfantMaleChild developmentParenting interventionPrimary health care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.