Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32419074›Full record

ReviewJournal of ultrasound2020

Ultrasound and bone: a pictorial review.

Stefano Bianchi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ultrasound, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05602077 (The Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography in Indirect Elbow Trauma Compared With Plain X-ray), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05602077 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Sonography in Indirect Elbow Trauma Compared With Plain X-ray: a Prospective Single Centre Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorEckehart SCHÖLLRan2022 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsElbow Fracture, Radial Head Fracture, Elbow Sprain, Coronoid Process FractureArmsPOCUS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Accuracy of Key Sonographic Markers for Juxta-Articular Fractures: A Prospective Study Using Explainable Machine Learning.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Primary malignant bone tumours-part 1].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stefano BianchiCIM SA Cabinet Imagerie Médicale, 40a route de Malagnou, 1208, Geneva, Switzerland. stefanobianchi@bluewin.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of bone mainly relies on standard radiographs, CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy depending on the anatomic region complexity and clinical scenario. Ultrasound (US), due to different acoustic impedance between soft tissues and the bone cortex, only allows the evaluation of the bone surfaces. Nevertheless, US can be useful in the evaluation of several bone disorders affecting the limbs as a result of its tomographic capabilities and high definition. This pictorial review article summarises our clinical experience in adults and reviews the literature on US bone examination. We first present the US appearance of normal bone and the main congenital anatomic variations, after which we illustrate the US findings of a variety of bone disorders. Although US has limits in bone assessment, its analysis must be a part of every musculoskeletal US examination.

Indexed as

Bone and BonesBone DiseasesHumansUltrasonographyBoneCongenital conditionsInfectionsTraumaTumoursUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32419074
PMCPMC7441135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.