Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32419072›Full record

SynthesisPituitary2020

Quality of care evaluation in non-functioning pituitary adenoma with chiasm compression: visual outcomes and timing of intervention clinical recommendations based on a systematic literature review and cohort study.

Iris C M Pelsma, Marco J T Verstegen, Friso de Vries, Irene C Notting, Marike L D Broekman, Wouter R van Furth, Nienke R Biermasz, Alberto M Pereira

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Iris C M PelsmaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. I.C.M.Pelsma@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4956-4037
Marco J T VerstegenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9739-7515
Friso de VriesDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3660-6093
Irene C NottingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3625-0752
Marike L D BroekmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2205-5179
Wouter R van FurthDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5208-921X
Nienke R BiermaszDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5817-3594
Alberto M PereiraDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-9866

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgery in patients with non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFMA) is effective in ameliorating visual function. The urgency for decompression, and preferred timing of surgery related to the preoperative severity of dysfunction is unknown.

methodsSystematic review for evidence to provide clinical guidance for timing of surgical decompression of the optic chiasm, and a cohort study of 30 NFMA patients, in whom mean deviation (MD), and severity of visual dysfunction was assessed.

resultsSystematic review 44 studies were included with a total of 4789 patients. Postoperatively, visual field defects improved in 87.0% of patients, stabilized in 12.8% and worsened in 1.0%. Specific protocols regarding timing of surgery were not reported. Only seven studies (16.7%) reported on either the duration of visual symptoms, or diagnostic, or treatment delay. Cohort study 30 NFMA patients (50% female, 60 eyes, mean age 58.5 ± 14.8 years), had a median MD of - 5.3 decibel (IQR - 3.1 to - 10.1). MD was strongly correlated with clinical severity (r =  - 0.94, P < 0.0001), and were used for severity of defects cut-off values: (1) normal >  - 2 dB, (2) mild - 2 dB to - 4 dB, (3) moderate - 4 to - 8 dB, (4) severe - 8 to - 17 dB, (5) very severe <  - 17 dB.

conclusionSurgical decompression is highly effective in improving visual function. Uniform, quantitative grading of visual dysfunction was lacking. MD is a promising quantitative outcome measure. We provide recommendations for the evaluation of timing of surgery, considering severity of visual impairment, which will need further validation based on expert clinical practice.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareRecovery of FunctionAdenomaCohort StudiesDecompression, SurgicalFemaleHemianopsiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedOptic ChiasmPituitary NeoplasmsSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenNon-functioning pituitary adenomaOptic chiasm compressionPituitary tumorTranssphenoidal surgeryVisual fieldsVisual outcome

Identifiers

PMID32419072
PMCPMC7316692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.