Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32419058›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2020

Anxiety, depression and psychosocial needs are the most frequent concerns reported by patients: preliminary results of a comparative explorative analysis of two hospital-based palliative care teams in Germany and Japan.

Birgitt van Oorschot, Koji Ishii, Yuko Kusomoto, Lea Overbeck, Theresa Zetzl, Carmen Roch, Andreas Mettenleiter, Hiroko Ozawa, Michael Flentje

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Psychiatry and Palliative Care: Growing the Interface Through Education.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Birgitt van OorschotInterdisciplinary Centre Palliative Care, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. Oorschot_b@ukw.de.
Koji IshiiPalliative Care Team, University Hospital Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yuko KusomotoPalliative Care Team, University Hospital Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan.
Lea OverbeckInterdisciplinary Centre Palliative Care, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Theresa ZetzlInterdisciplinary Centre Palliative Care, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Carmen RochInterdisciplinary Centre Palliative Care, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Andreas MettenleiterInstitute of the History of Medicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Hiroko OzawaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Michael FlentjeInterdisciplinary Centre Palliative Care, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DENagasaki University Hospital · JPNagasaki University · JPUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the partnership between the medical departments of Würzburg University, Germany, and Nagasaki University, Japan, palliative care is a relevant topic. The aim of the study was to perform a comparative analysis of the hospital-based palliative care teams in Würzburg (PCT-W) and Nagasaki (PCT-N). Survey of staff composition and retrospective analysis of PCT patient charts in both PCTs were conducted. Patients self-assessed their symptoms in PCT-W and in Radiation Oncology Würzburg (RO-W). The (negative) quality indicator 'percentage of deceased hospitalised patients with PCT contact for less than 3 days before death' (Earle in Int J Qual Health Care 17(6):505-509, 2005) was analysed. Both PCTs follow a multidisciplinary team approach. PCT-N saw 410 cancer patients versus 853 patients for PCT-W (22.8% non-cancer patients). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status at first contact with PCT-N was 3 or 4 in 39.3% of patients versus 79.0% for PCT-W. PCT-N was engaged in co-management longer than PCT-W (mean 20.7 days, range 1-102 versus mean 4.9 days, range 1-48). The most frequent patient-reported psychological symptom was anxiety (family anxiety: 98.3% PCT-W and 88.7% RO-W, anxiety 97.9% PCT-W and 85.9% RO-W), followed by depression (98.2% PCT-W and 80.3% RO-W). In 14 of the 148 deceased patients, PCT-N contact was initiated less than 3 days before death (9.4%) versus 121 of the 729 deceased PCT-W patients (16.6%). Psychological needs are highly relevant in both Germany and Japan, with more than 85% anxiety and depression in patients in the Japanese IPOS validation study (Sakurai in Jpn J Clin Oncol 49(3):257-262, 2019). This should be taken into account when implementing PCTs.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPalliative CareAnxietyDepressionGermanyHospitalsHumansJapanPatient Care TeamRetrospective StudiesAnxietyDepressionHospital-based palliative carePatient-reported outcomeQuaility indicator

Identifiers

PMID32419058
PMCPMC7578135
OpenAlexW3025705079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.