ReviewAttention, perception & psychophysics2021
Extending the study of visual attention to a multisensory world (Charles W. Eriksen Special Issue).
Review in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the role of magician patter on deception in the Three-Card Monte.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Neuro-cortical signatures of attention in uni- and multi-sensory audio-visual processing in children.Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Inducing visual attention through audiovisual stimuli: Can synchronous sound be a salient event?Perception · 2024Article
- An Exploration of the Effects of Cross-Modal Tasks on Selective Attention.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Auditory selective attention under working memory load.Psychological research · 2021Article
- The level of representation of irrelevant stimuli-Distractor-response binding within and between the senses.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- When irrelevant information helps: Extending the Eriksen-flanker task into a multisensory world.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Article
- Aging and the (Chemical) Senses: Implications for Food Behaviour Amongst Elderly Consumers.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Using Ambient Scent to Enhance Well-Being in the Multisensory Built Environment.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Charles W. Eriksen (1923-2018), long-time editor of Perception & Psychophysics (1971-1993) - the precursor to the present journal - undoubtedly made a profound contribution to the study of selective attention in the visual modality. Working primarily with neurologically normal adults, his early research provided both theoretical accounts for behavioral phenomena as well as robust experimental tasks, including the well-known Eriksen flanker task. The latter paradigm has been used and adapted by many researchers over the subsequent decades. While Eriksen's research interests were primarily focused on situations of unimodal visual spatially selective attention, here I review evidence from those studies that have attempted to extend Eriksen's general approach to non-visual (i.e., auditory and tactile) selection and the more realistic situations of multisensory spatial attentional selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.