ArticleVaccine2020
WHO working group meeting to develop WHO Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of enterovirus 71 vaccines.
Article in Vaccine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening of a potential coxsackievirus B4 vaccine strain through analysis of biological features.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Screening of Insertion Sites and Tags on EV-A71 VP1 Protein for Recombinant Virus Construction.Viruses · 2025Article
- A screening study on the detection strain of Coxsackievirus A6: the key to evaluating neutralizing antibodies in vaccines.Emerging microbes & infections · 2024Article
- Effect of EV71 Vaccination on Transmission Dynamics of Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease and Its Epidemic Prevention Threshold.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Article
- In vitro synergistic antiviral activity of repurposed drugs against enterovirus 71.Archives of virology · 2024Article
- Application of Pseudotyped Viruses.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Review
- Effect of difference between EV-A71 virus epidemic strain and "vaccine strain" on neutralizing antibody titer.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2022Article
- Development of an Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of the Native Conformation of Enterovirus A71.mSphere · 2022Article
- Bioinformatics-based prediction of conformational epitopes for Enterovirus A71 and Coxsackievirus A16.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Enterovirus A71 Vaccines.Vaccines · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enterovirus A71 (EV71) is one of the major causative agents of hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), and is sometimes associated with severe central nervous system syndromes. Vaccines against EV71 infection have been developed or are in development in several countries and few have been licensed in China. In response to requests from some of these countries, WHO convened a working group meeting in Shanghai China from 11 to 12 September 2019 to develop WHO Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of EV71 vaccines. Meeting participants included members of the drafting group, experts from vaccine developers, manufacturers, regulators and academia. The epidemiology of EV71, as well as the development, regulation and standardization of EV71 vaccines were reviewed in the meeting. Information on R&D, manufacturing, quality control and standardization of EV71 vaccines was presented by vaccine developers, manufacturers and regulators. Based on their experience, the working group discussed the main principles that would determine WHO's position on quality, safety and efficacy of EV71 vaccines. The working group agreed to develop WHO Recommendations to assure the quality, safety and efficacy of inactivated EV71 vaccines with a scope covering only whole virus inactivated vaccines. Other type of vaccines, such as EV71 virus-like particles (VLPs) will not be covered as they are still at the developmental stage. The outline of the document was agreed and will follow the usual style of WHO recommendations. It was also agreed to submit the draft Recommendations for review and adoption to the WHO ECBS in 2020 following discussion at a WHO informal consultation, which will include NRAs and vaccine manufacturers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.