Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32418728›Full record

ReviewTherapie

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, pharmacology, and COVID-19 infection.

Joëlle Micallef, Thomas Soeiro, Annie-Pierre Jonville-Béra, French Society of Pharmacology, Therapeutics (SFPT)

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Active prescription of low-dose aspirin during or prior to hospitalization and mortality in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjusted effect estimates.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The standardization and efficacy of fermentedOpen veterinary journal · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Effect of the Duration of NSAID Use on COVID-19.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joëlle MicallefAix-Marseille université, Inserm, UMR 1106, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, service de pharmacologie clinique, centre régional de pharmacovigilance, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13005 Marseille, France. Electronic address: joelle.micallef@ap-hm.fr.
Thomas SoeiroAix-Marseille université, Inserm, UMR 1106, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, service de pharmacologie clinique, centre régional de pharmacovigilance, 264, rue Saint-Pierre, 13005 Marseille, France.
Annie-Pierre Jonville-BéraCentre hospitalier régional universitaire de Tours, service de pharmacosurveillance, centre régional de pharmacovigilance, 37000 Tours, France.
French Society of Pharmacology, Therapeutics (SFPT)
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have an optional prescription status that has resulted in frequent use, in particular for the symptomatic treatment of fever and non-rheumatic pain. In 2019, a multi-source analysis of complementary pharmacological data showed that using NSAIDs in these indications (potentially indicative of an underlying infection) increases the risk of a severe bacterial complication, in particular in the case of lung infections. First, the clinical observations of the French Pharmacovigilance Network showed that severe bacterial infections can occur even after a short NSAID treatment, and even if the NSAID is associated with an antibiotic. Second, pharmacoepidemiological studies, some of which minimized the protopathic bias, all converged and confirmed the risk. Third, experimental in vitro and in vivo animal studies suggest several biological mechanisms, which strengthens a causal link beyond the well-known risk of delaying the care of the infection (immunomodulatory effects, effects on S. pyogenes infections, and reduced antibiotics efficacy). Therefore, in case of infection, symptomatic treatment with NSAIDs for non-severe symptoms (fever, pain, or myalgia) is not to be recommended, given a range of clinical and scientific arguments supporting an increased risk of severe bacterial complication. Besides, the existence of a safer drug alternative, with paracetamol at recommended doses, makes this recommendation of precaution and common sense even more legitimate. In 2020, such recommendation is more topical than ever with the emergence of COVID-19, especially since it results in fever, headaches, muscular pain, and cough, and is further complicated with pneumopathy, and given experimental data suggesting a link between ibuprofen and the level of expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBacterial InfectionsCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19FranceHumansIbuprofenPandemicsPeptidyl-Dipeptidase APneumonia, ViralACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIbuprofenPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AAnti-inflammatory agents, non-steroidalCOVID-19InfectionsPharmacoepidemiologyPharmacovigilanceRespiratory tract infectionsSuperinfection

Identifiers

PMID32418728
PMCPMC7204680
OpenAlexW3021161969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.