ArticleMedical physics2020
Head and neck cancer patient images for determining auto-segmentation accuracy in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging through expert manual segmentations.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning in MRI-guided radiation therapy: A systematic review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical validation of AI-assisted contouring in prostate radiation therapy treatment planning: Highlighting automation bias and the need for standardized quality assurance.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- The dosimetric impacts of ct-based deep learning autocontouring algorithm for prostate cancer radiotherapy planning dosimetric accuracy of DirectORGANS.BMC urology · 2025Article
- A comprehensive multifaceted technical evaluation framework for implementation of auto-segmentation models in radiotherapy.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Parotid Gland Segmentation Using Purely Transformer-Based U-Shaped Network and Multimodal MRI.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Auto-segmentation of neck nodal metastases using self-distilled masked image transformer on longitudinal MR images.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Spot delivery error predictions for intensity modulated proton therapy using robustness analysis with machine learning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Article
- Automated Contouring and Planning in Radiation Therapy: What Is 'Clinically Acceptable'?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A review of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer patients for treatment evaluation and prediction of radiation-induced xerostomia.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2023Review
- Segmentation stability of human head and neck cancer medical images for radiotherapy applications under de-identification conditions: Benchmarking data sharing and artificial intelligence use-cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A clinical evaluation of the performance of five commercial artificial intelligence contouring systems for radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Radiation Oncology Applications Using Public Datasets.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2022Review
- Auto-segmentation for total marrow irradiation.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Deep learning vs. atlas-based models for fast auto-segmentation of the masticatory muscles on head and neck CT images.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiotherapy treatment planning has rapidly increased due to its ability to evaluate patient's anatomy without the use of ionizing radiation and due to its high soft tissue contrast. For these reasons, MRI has become the modality of choice for longitudinal and adaptive treatment studies. Automatic segmentation could offer many benefits for these studies. In this work, we describe a T2-weighted MRI dataset of head and neck cancer patients that can be used to evaluate the accuracy of head and neck normal tissue auto-segmentation systems through comparisons to available expert manual segmentations. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION
methodsT2-weighted MRI images were acquired for 55 head and neck cancer patients. These scans were collected after radiotherapy computed tomography (CT) simulation scans using a thermoplastic mask to replicate patient treatment position. All scans were acquired on a single 1.5 T Siemens MAGNETOM Aera MRI with two large four-channel flex phased-array coils. The scans covered the region encompassing the nasopharynx region cranially and supraclavicular lymph node region caudally, when possible, in the superior-inferior direction. Manual contours were created for the left/right submandibular gland, left/right parotids, left/right lymph node level II, and left/right lymph node level III. These contours underwent quality assurance to ensure adherence to predefined guidelines, and were corrected if edits were necessary. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: The T2-weighted images and RTSTRUCT files are available in DICOM format. The regions of interest are named based on AAPM's Task Group 263 nomenclature recommendations (Glnd_Submand_L, Glnd_Submand_R, LN_Neck_II_L, Parotid_L, Parotid_R, LN_Neck_II_R, LN_Neck_III_L, LN_Neck_III_R). This dataset is available on The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) by the National Cancer Institute under the collection "AAPM RT-MAC Grand Challenge 2019" (https://doi.org/10.7937/tcia.2019.bcfjqfqb). POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: This dataset provides head and neck patient MRI scans to evaluate auto-segmentation systems on T2-weighted images. Additional anatomies could be provided at a later time to enhance the existing library of contours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.