Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32418336›Full record

ReviewMedical physics2020

Machine and deep learning methods for radiomics.

Michele Avanzo, Lise Wei, Joseph Stancanello, Martin Vallières, Arvind Rao, Olivier Morin, Sarah A Mattonen, Issam El Naqa

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06579768 (Preoperative Differentiation of Jaw Cystic Lesions Based on Radiomics From Computed Tomography Images), which is not on this map. Cited by 339 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
339citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06579768 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Preoperative Differentiation of Jaw Cystic Lesions Based on Radiomics From Computed Tomography Images: A Multicenter, Prospective Machine Learning Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsJawbone Cysitc LesionArmsdifferent types of computed tomography (CT) scans
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

339 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

279 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michele AvanzoDepartment of Medical Physics, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, PN, 33081, Italy.
Lise WeiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.
Joseph StancanelloGuerbet SA, Villepinte, France.
Martin VallièresMedical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Arvind RaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.
Olivier MorinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Sarah A MattonenDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Issam El NaqaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48103, USA.

Funding

Optimal Decision Making in Radiotherapy Using Panomics AnalyticsR01CA233487 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EL NAQA, ISSAM M. · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics is an emerging area in quantitative image analysis that aims to relate large-scale extracted imaging information to clinical and biological endpoints. The development of quantitative imaging methods along with machine learning has enabled the opportunity to move data science research towards translation for more personalized cancer treatments. Accumulating evidence has indeed demonstrated that noninvasive advanced imaging analytics, that is, radiomics, can reveal key components of tumor phenotype for multiple three-dimensional lesions at multiple time points over and beyond the course of treatment. These developments in the use of CT, PET, US, and MR imaging could augment patient stratification and prognostication buttressing emerging targeted therapeutic approaches. In recent years, deep learning architectures have demonstrated their tremendous potential for image segmentation, reconstruction, recognition, and classification. Many powerful open-source and commercial platforms are currently available to embark in new research areas of radiomics. Quantitative imaging research, however, is complex and key statistical principles should be followed to realize its full potential. The field of radiomics, in particular, requires a renewed focus on optimal study design/reporting practices and standardization of image acquisition, feature calculation, and rigorous statistical analysis for the field to move forward. In this article, the role of machine and deep learning as a major computational vehicle for advanced model building of radiomics-based signatures or classifiers, and diverse clinical applications, working principles, research opportunities, and available computational platforms for radiomics will be reviewed with examples drawn primarily from oncology. We also address issues related to common applications in medical physics, such as standardization, feature extraction, model building, and validation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsdeep learningmachine learningquantitative image analysisradiomics

Identifiers

PMID32418336
PMCPMC8965689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.