SynthesisColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2020
Persistent viral shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in faeces - a rapid review.
Synthesis in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
110 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gastrointestinal Sequelae of COVID-19: Investigating Post-Infection Complications-A Systematic Review.Viruses · 2024Pooled it
- Recent progress on wastewater-based epidemiology for COVID-19 surveillance: A systematic review of analytical procedures and epidemiological modeling.The Science of the total environment · 2023Pooled it
- Gut distress and interventionFrontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Case fatality rate of the adult in-patients with COVID-19 and digestive system tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Wastewater surveillance to infer COVID-19 transmission: A systematic review.The Science of the total environment · 2022Pooled it
- How strong is the evidence that it is possible to get SARS-CoV-2 twice? A systematic review.Reviews in medical virology · 2021Pooled it
- Prevalence and Persistent Shedding of Fecal SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Patients With COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
- Vertical transmission of coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2021Pooled it
- On the whereabouts of SARS-CoV-2 in the human body: A systematic review.PLoS pathogens · 2020Pooled it
- Frequency, dynamics, and duration of faecal shedding in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals, a scoping review.Epidemiology and infection · 2026Article
- Article
- Long-Term Sewage Survey of SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), and Correlation to Human Cases in a City with One Million Inhabitants.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Post-recovery viral shedding shapes wastewater-based epidemiological inferences.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- The consequences of SARS-CoV-2 within-host persistence.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Fate-and-transport modeling of SARS-CoV-2 for rural wastewater-based epidemiology application benefit.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The Multisystem Impact of Long COVID: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Feasibility of wastewater-based detection of emergent pandemics through a global network of airports.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- A long-term passive sampling approach for wastewater-based monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in Leipzig, Germany.The Science of the total environment · 2023Article
- Long-term study on wastewater SARS-CoV-2 surveillance across United Arab Emirates.The Science of the total environment · 2023Article
50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimIn addition to respiratory symptoms, COVID-19 can present with gastrointestinal complaints suggesting possible faeco-oral transmission. The primary aim of this review was to establish the incidence and timing of positive faecal samples for SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19.
methodsA systematic literature review identified studies describing COVID-19 patients tested for faecal virus. Search terms for MEDLINE included 'clinical', 'faeces', 'gastrointestinal secretions', 'stool', 'COVID-19', 'SARS-CoV-2' and '2019-nCoV'. Additional searches were done in the American Journal of Gastroenterology, Gastroenterology, Gut, Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, the World Health Organization Database, the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, social media and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints. Data were extracted concerning the type of test, number and timing of positive samples, incidence of positive faecal tests after negative nasopharyngeal swabs and evidence of viable faecal virus or faeco-oral transmission of the virus.
resultsTwenty-six relevant articles were identified. Combining study results demonstrated that 53.9% of those tested for faecal RNA were positive. The duration of faecal viral shedding ranged from 1 to 33 days after a negative nasopharyngeal swab with one result remaining positive 47 days after onset of symptoms. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that COVID-19 is transmitted via faecally shed virus.
conclusionThere is a high rate of positive polymerase chain reaction tests with persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in faecal samples of patients with COVID-19. Further research is needed to confirm if this virus is viable and the degree of transmission through the faeco-oral route. This may have important implications on isolation, recommended precautions and protective equipment for interventional procedures involving the gastrointestinal tract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.