Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32418147›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021

Development, implementation and preliminary evaluation of clinical dashboards in a department of anesthesia.

Géry Laurent, Mouhamed D Moussa, Cédric Cirenei, Benoît Tavernier, Romaric Marcilly, Antoine Lamer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Géry LaurentINSERM, CHU Lille, CIC-IT/Evalab 1403 - Centre d'Investigation Clinique, 59000, Lille, France.
Mouhamed D MoussaCHU Lille, Pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, 59000, Lille, France.
Cédric CireneiCHU Lille, Pôle d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, 59000, Lille, France.
Benoît TavernierUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS: Évaluation des Technologies de santé et des Pratiques médicales, 59000, Lille, France.
Romaric MarcillyINSERM, CHU Lille, CIC-IT/Evalab 1403 - Centre d'Investigation Clinique, 59000, Lille, France.
Antoine LamerINSERM, CHU Lille, CIC-IT/Evalab 1403 - Centre d'Investigation Clinique, 59000, Lille, France. antoine.lamer@chru-lille.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9546-1808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical dashboards summarize indicators of high-volume patient data in a concise, user-friendly visual format. There are few studies of the use of dashboards to improve professional practice in anesthesiology. The objective of the present study was to describe the user-centered development, implementation and preliminary evaluation of clinical dashboards dealing with anesthesia unit management and quality assessment in a French university medical center. User needs and technical requirements were identified in end user interviews and then synthesized. Several representations were then developed (according to good visualization practice) and submitted to end users for appraisal. Lastly, dashboards were implemented and made accessible for everyday use via the medical center's network. After a period of use, end user feedback on the dashboard platform was collected as a system usability score (range 0 to 100). Seventeen themes (corresponding to 29 questions and 42 indicators) were identified. After prioritization and feasibility assessment, 10 dashboards were ultimately implemented and deployed. The dashboards variously addressed the unit's overall activity, compliance with guidelines on intraoperative hemodynamics, ventilation and monitoring, and documentation of the anesthesia procedure. The mean (standard deviation) system usability score was 82.6 (11.5), which corresponded to excellent usability. We developed clinical dashboards for a university medical center's anesthesia units. The dashboards' deployment was well received by the center's anesthesiologists. The dashboards' impact on activity and practice after several months of use will now have to be assessed.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthesiologyFeedbackHumansAnesthesiaDashboardData reuseData visualization

Identifiers

PMID32418147
PMCPMC7229430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.