ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020
Likelihood of achieving a 50%, 60%, or 70% estimated live birth rate threshold with 1 or 2 cycles of planned oocyte cryopreservation.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stage-structured, distributional prediction of IVF outcomes with conditional updating.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- After the Shock: Impact of Ectopic Pregnancy on Subsequent Fertility and Parenthood.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The effects of age, mature oocyte number, and cycle number on cumulative live birth rates after planned oocyte cryopreservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- No guarantees: planned oocyte cryopreservation, not quite an insurance policy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Review
- Racial Disparities in Fertility Care: A Narrative Review of Challenges in the Utilization of Fertility Preservation and ART in Minority Populations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Oocyte Cryopreservation for Medical and Planned Indications: A Practical Guide and Overview.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Fertility preservation in pediatric healthcare: a review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
- Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2022Review
- First Childbirth after Fertility Preservation and Gender Reassigning Surgery from Indian Transgender Community.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo characterize the likelihood of cryopreserving enough oocytes for 50%, 60%, or 70% estimated live birth rate (eLBR) with 1-2 planned oocyte cryopreservation (Pl-OC) cycles.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing all patients completing ≥ 1 Pl-OC cycle from 2016 to 2018 at a large single-center OC program. Subjects were categorized by age at retrieval and number of cycles. We extrapolated age-based oocyte thresholds for 50%, 60%, or 70% eLBR from previously published data. We calculated the proportion of subjects overall, and for each age group, whose number of frozen oocytes was greater than or equal to their age-based threshold for a 50%, 60%, or 70% eLBR after 1 and 2 cycles. OR for 60% eLBR with one cycle was calculated for age and AMH cutoff values and corroborated with logistic regression.
resultsA total of 1241 subjects, completing 1799 Pl-OC cycles, were included. With one cycle, 66% (819/1241) achieved ≥ 50% eLBR and 51% (634/1241) achieved 70% eLBR. With two cycles, 79.6% (988/1241) attained ≥ 50% eLBR and 65.5% (813/1241) achieved 70% eLBR. Achieving 50%, 60%, or 70% eLBR with 1-2 cycles was significantly associated with both age (p < 0.001) and AMH (p < 0.001). Age < 37.5 and AMH > 1.995 were independently associated with attaining 60% eLBR with one cycle (age: OR 13.73; 95%CI 9.16-20.57, p < 0.001; AMH: OR 7.32; 95% CI 5.50-9.76, p < 0.001).
conclusionsYounger age and higher AMH were associated with achieving 50%, 60%, or 70% eLBR thresholds with Pl-OC. Nevertheless, almost all subjects were successfully able to preserve enough oocytes for ≥ 50% eLBR in 1-2 cycles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.