Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32418097›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Biomarkers of oxidative stress and cell damage in freshwater bivalves Diplodon parodizi exposed to landfill leachate.

Juliani Giselli Prestes, Maria Rosa Dmengeon Pedreiro De Souza, Priscila Krebsbach Kandalski, Tatiana Herrerias, Cintia Machado, Elen de Arruda Martins, Vanessa Abelaira Dos Anjos, Ananda Karla Alves Neundorf, Diego Mauro Carneiro Pereira, Maurício Osvaldo Moura and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juliani Giselli PrestesEcology and Conservation Laboratory, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Maria Rosa Dmengeon Pedreiro De SouzaDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Priscila Krebsbach KandalskiDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Tatiana HerreriasGuairacá Faculty, Guarapuava, Brazil.
Cintia MachadoDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Elen de Arruda MartinsDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Vanessa Abelaira Dos AnjosDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Ananda Karla Alves NeundorfDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Diego Mauro Carneiro PereiraDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Maurício Osvaldo MouraDepartment of Zoology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.
Lucelia DonattiDepartment of Cell Biology, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. donatti@ufpr.br.
Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRFaculdade Guairacá · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 304208/2016-7Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior projects CAPES Finance Code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Landfill is a public and environmental health problem; establishing and understanding methodologies to decrease its toxicity are thus necessary. Leachate samples were collected, at a sanitary landfill, immediately after the exit from the landfill, i.e. raw leachate (collection point A), after conventional treatment (point B) and after treatment by wetlands (point C). D. parodizi specimens were exposed to 3%, 10% and control (0%) dilutions of leachate from these collection points for 7 days. Markers of antioxidant defences and cell damage were analysed. At point B, the gills of D. parodizi showed higher glutathione-S-transferase (GST) and glutathione reductase (GR) activity; the latter is a supplier of glutathione reductase (GSH). The low GST activity at point A was associated with the hormesis effect. Higher levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) occurred at point A. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH) was inhibited at the points with the highest pollutant load and at the highest leachate dilutions. Higher levels of markers at point A may be related to the high pollutant charge and specific compounds present in the untreated leachate. The multi-xenobiotic resistance mechanism (MXR), metallothionein-like proteins (MT) and lipid peroxidation (LPO) did not vary among treatments. The biomarker responses showed negative effects of the leachate on the freshwater bivalve and simultaneously showed that the wetland treatment employed at the Caximba sanitary landfill is effective.

Indexed as

BivalviaAnimalsBiomarkersCatalaseFresh WaterGlutathione PeroxidaseGlutathione TransferaseLipid PeroxidationOxidative StressSuperoxide DismutaseWater Pollutants, ChemicalBiomarkersCatalaseGlutathione PeroxidaseGlutathione TransferaseSuperoxide DismutaseWater Pollutants, ChemicalAntioxidant defenceBiological treatmentCell damageFreshwater bivalvesPollutionWetlands

Identifiers

PMID32418097
OpenAlexW3025914456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.