Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32418040›Full record

Observational studyClinical rheumatology2020

Effectiveness of steroid injection for hand psoriatic dactylitis: results from a multicentre prospective observational study.

Nicolò Girolimetto, Pierluigi Macchioni, Giorgia Citriniti, Ilaria Tinazzi, Vittoria Bascherini, Federica Martinis, Antonio Marchetta, Niccolò Possemato, Marco Tasso, Rosario Peluso and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Corticosteroid injection treatment for dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolò GirolimettoRheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Pierluigi MacchioniDepartment of Rheumatology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Giorgia CitrinitiDepartment of Rheumatology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Ilaria TinazziUnit of Rheumatology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Vittoria BascheriniRheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Federica MartinisUnit of Rheumatology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Antonio MarchettaUnit of Rheumatology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Niccolò PossematoDepartment of Rheumatology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Marco TassoRheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Rosario PelusoRheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Leonardo PunziCentre for Gout and Metabolic Bone and Joint Diseases, Rheumatology, SS Giovanni and Paolo, Venice, Italy.
Carlo SalvaraniDepartment of Rheumatology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Raffaele ScarpaRheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. rscarpa@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5808-6607
Dennis McGonagleNIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust and the University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Luisa Costa *Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Francesco Caso *Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Federico II University Hospital · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of steroid injection (local treatment, LT) into the digital flexor tendon sheath of dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients as compared with systemic treatment (ST).

methodsForty-six PsA patients with a total of 73 dactylitic fingers were assessed in an observational, multicentre, prospective study by the Leeds Dactylitis Index basic (LDI-b) score and evaluated for local pain (visual analogue scale-VAS pain) and functional impairment (VAS-FI). Steroid injection was proposed to all patients. Patients refusing LT were treated with oral NSAIDs. Both the groups continued baseline csDMARDs and/or corticosteroids therapy. The clinical outcomes were measured at baseline, 1 month (T1) and 3 months (T3).

resultsThe reduction of VAS-pain, VAS-FI and LDI-b values was statistically significant higher in the LT group (24 patients, 38 dactylitic fingers) as compared with the ST group (22 patients, 35 dactylitic fingers), both at T1 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) and at T3 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). A clinically meaningful treatment response (defined as a contemporary reduction of at least 5 points in VAS-pain and VAS-FI or as values of VAS-pain and VAS-FI were both ≤ 2) was observed at T1 in 33 (87%) digits in LT group and in 6 (17%) digits in ST group (p < 0.001). At T3, clinical response improved significantly in both the groups, with significant difference (94% vs 31%, p < 0.001).

conclusionsFor the first time, we show the effectiveness of steroid injection into the digital flexor tendon sheath in improving clinical aspects of hand psoriatic dactylitis. Key Points • Therapy with steroid injection (local treatment, LT), into the digital flexor tendon sheath for the treatment of active dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis patients, is more effective when compared with systemic treatment (ST) alone. • The reduction of VAS-pain, VAS-functional impairment (VAS-FI) and Leeds Dactylitis Index basic values was statistically significant higher in the LT group as compared with the ST group, both at T1and at T3. • A clinically meaningful response was observed at T1 in 87% of digits of patients treated with steroid injection and in 17% of digits of the systemic treatment group (p < 0.001). At T3, clinical response improved significantly in both the groups, with significant difference. • For the first time, findings from this study show that the use of steroid injections into the digital flexor tendon sheath for psoriatic dactylitis could be an effective and safe first-line therapy for psoriatic dactylitis.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticHandHumansProspective StudiesSteroidsTendonsSteroidsDactylitisDigital flexor tendon sheathFlexor tenosynovitisPsoriatic arthritisSteroid injection

Identifiers

PMID32418040
OpenAlexW3025156517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.