ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2020
Two cases of benign hepatic nodules caused by sinusoidal dilatation with different hemodynamics.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We describe two cases of benign nodules caused by sinusoidal dilatation with different hemodynamic statuses. Case 1 was a 50-year-old woman with a 1-cm nodule that showed a low density in the arterial phase of computed tomography. Pathologically, there were no atypical cells with sinusoidal dilatation, and immunostaining was negative for CD34. We speculated that sinusoidal dilatation was caused by congestion due to loss of frequency of the central vein. In contrast, case 2 was a 50-year-old woman with a 1.5-cm nodule that was highly stained in the arterial phase of computed tomography. Although she had a sinusoidal dilatation similar to that in case 1, immunostaining was positive for CD34. Sinusoidal dilatation was thought to be caused by hyperperfusion of arterial blood. Moreover, CD34 may be potentially useful for the differentiation of the hemodynamic status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.