Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020
Postoperative morbidity after adenotonsillectomy versus adenopharyngoplasty in young children with obstructive sleep apnea: an RCT.
Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn our previous randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparing adenotonsillectomy (ATE) with adenopharyngoplasty (APP) in children with severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there were no differences in respiratory sleep parameters or quality of life. The purpose of the present report was to evaluate postoperative morbidity from this RCT.
methodsThe study was a blinded RCT in 83 children (ATE = 47; APP = 36), 2-4 years of age, with an obstructive apnea-hypopnea index of ≥ 10. Pain was assessed from the first until the tenth day after surgery with a logbook that reported pain by child (FPS-R, Faces Pain Scale-Revised) and caregiver (visual analogue scale), analgesic use, return to normal diet, and weight change. Bleeding, infection, satisfaction with treatment, speech, and swallowing were assessed with a questionnaire and medical records 6 months after surgery.
resultsSixty-four children (77%) returned the logbook and 65 (78%) answered the questionnaire. The median (interquartile range) day the children graded themselves as pain free (FPS-R = 0) was 7 (6-10) after ATE, compared with 9 (7 to > 10) after APP (p = 0.018). There were no other significant differences between the groups regarding any other pain-related outcomes, bleeding, infection, satisfaction, swallowing, or speech, but three children (11%) reported impaired speech after APP compared to none after ATE (p = 0.067).
conclusionThe results regarding postoperative morbidity were in favor of ATE and the results from our previous report showed no advantages of APP. Therefore, APP should not be recommended in young, otherwise healthy children with OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.