ArticleBone marrow transplantation2020
Building a hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes registry in Mexico.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes within the care of hematopoietic cell transplantation patients after the shift of a Mexican institution to a COVID-19-only center.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) data collection using an electronic platform at Mexican centers. Four public centers performing HCT in adults were included. A cloud-based electronic platform in Spanish was developed to allow real-time registration of demographic, clinical, and outcomes variables. Data were obtained from paper and electronic medical records and institutional databases. Data managers were hired to perform the collection. Data from January 2015 to December 2018 were retro and prospectively collected during a 10-month period. From 2015 to 2018, 473 HCT were performed. Most were autologous (55%). Patients undergoing autologous HCT had the highest median age (49 years) compared with patients undergoing allogeneic (34 years) or haploidentical HCT (29 years). The most common underlying disease for autologous HCT was multiple myeloma. Acute leukemias were the most common diagnoses among allogeneic and haploidentical HCT recipients. Two-year nonrelapse mortality was 2.5%, 18%, and 18% for autologous, allogeneic, and haploidentical HCT, respectively. We determined it was feasible to start a multicenter collaborative study in Mexico as it was very well received by the physicians and it can lead to the creation of a Mexican HCT Registry in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.