Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32417837›Full record

SynthesisMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2020

How Much of Root Cause Analysis Translates into Improved Patient Safety: A Systematic Review.

Jimmy Martin-Delgado, Alba Martínez-García, Jesús María Aranaz, José L Valencia-Martín, José Joaquín Mira

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quality indicators in respiratory therapy.World journal of critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Medical errors can cost lives.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jimmy Martin-DelgadoAtenea Investigation Group, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitario y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain, jimmy.martind@umh.es.
Alba Martínez-GarcíaDepartment of Health Psychology, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.
Jesús María AranazPreventive Medicine Service, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
José L Valencia-MartínPreventive Medicine Service, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
José Joaquín MiraAtenea Investigation Group, Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitario y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESUniversitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this systematic review was to consolidate studies to determine whether root cause analysis (RCA) is an adequate method to decrease recurrence of avoidable adverse events (AAEs).

methodsA systematic search of databases from creation until December 2018 was performed using PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE. We included articles published in scientific journals describing the practical usefulness in and impact of RCA on the reduction of AAEs and whether professionals consider it feasible. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of studies.

resultsTwenty-one articles met the inclusion criteria. Samples included in these studies ranged from 20 to 1,707 analyses of RCAs, AAEs, recommendations, audits or interviews with professionals. The most common setting was hospitals (86%; n = 18), and the type of incident most analysed was AAEs, in 71% (n = 15) of the cases; 47% (n = 10) of the studies stated that the main weakness of RCA is its recommendations. The most common causes involved in the occurrence of AEs were communication problems among professionals, human error and faults in the organisation of the health care process. Despite the widespread implementation of RCA in the past decades, only 2 studies could to some extent establish an improvement in patient safety due to RCAs.

conclusionsRCA is a useful tool for the identification of the remote and immediate causes of safety incidents, but not for implementing effective measures to prevent their recurrence.

Indexed as

CommunicationHumansIatrogenic DiseaseMedical ErrorsPatient SafetyQuality ImprovementRoot Cause AnalysisPatient safetyQuality assuranceRoot cause analysisTranslational medicine

Identifiers

PMID32417837
PMCPMC7768139
OpenAlexW3025339662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.