Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32417796›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Parkinson's disease2020

Gait Kinematic Parameters in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.

Raquel Bouça-Machado, Constança Jalles, Daniela Guerreiro, Filipa Pona-Ferreira, Diogo Branco, Tiago Guerreiro, Ricardo Matias, Joaquim J Ferreira

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gait analysis methods in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raquel Bouça-MachadoInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal.
Constança JallesInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal.
Daniela GuerreiroCNS - Campus Neurológico Sénior, Torres Vedras, Portugal.
Filipa Pona-FerreiraCNS - Campus Neurológico Sénior, Torres Vedras, Portugal.
Diogo BrancoLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Tiago GuerreiroLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ricardo MatiasChampalimaud Research and Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal.
Joaquim J FerreiraInstituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal.
University of Lisbon · PTInstituto Superior Politécnico do Oeste · PTChampalimaud Foundation · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGait impairments are common and highly disabling for Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. With the development of technology-based tools, it is now possible to measure the spatiotemporal parameters of gait with a reduced margin of error, thereby enabling a more accurate characterization of impairment.

objectiveTo summarize and critically appraise the characteristics of technology-based gait analysis in PD and to provide mean and standard deviation values for spatiotemporal gait parameters.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using the databases CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and PEDro from their inception to September 2019 to identify all observational and experimental studies conducted in PD or atypical parkinsonism that included a technology-based gait assessment. Two reviewers independently screened citations and extracted data.

resultsWe included 95 studies, 82.1% (n = 78) reporting a laboratory gait assessment and 61.1% (n = 58 studies) using a wearable sensor. The most frequently reported parameters were gait velocity, stride and step length, and cadence. A statistically significant difference was found when comparing the mean values of each of these parameters in PD patients versus healthy controls. No statistically significant differences were found in the mean value of the parameters when comparing wearable versus non-wearable sensors, different types of wearable sensors, and different sensor locations.

conclusionOur results provide useful information for performing objective technology-based gait assessment in PD, as well as mean values to better interpret the results. Further studies should explore the clinical meaningfulness of each parameter and how they behave in a free-living context and throughout disease progression.

Indexed as

AgedBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleGaitHumansMaleParkinson DiseasePostural BalanceWearable Electronic Devicesgaitobjective assessmentParkinson’s diseasetechnologywearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID32417796
PMCPMC7458503
OpenAlexW3025667319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.