ArticlePreventive medicine2020
Tobacco control policy and smoking among older Americans: An analysis of a nationally-representative longitudinal sample (1992-2014).
Article in Preventive medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Analysis and Projection of the Burden of Chronic Respiratory Diseases Attributable to Smoking in China, 1990-2021].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Article
- Associations between state tobacco control measures and cigarette purchases by U.S. households, 2015-2021.Preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Inequalities and age-period-cohort effects of global and regional burden for interstitial lung disease and pulmonary sarcoidosis: based on Global Burden of Disease study 2021.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Cigarette taxes, prices, and disparities in current smoking in the United States.SSM - population health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Smoking has decreased less rapidly among older adults than among the working age population in the United States. This study examines whether tobacco control policy, specifically smoke-free laws and increased cigarette prices, are associated with smoking cessation and lower smoking intensity among older adults. In addition, it considers whether the effect of smoke-free laws varied by labor force participation. Using geocoded longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement study collected from 1992 to 2014, I estimate survival models to evaluate the association between the implementation of city, county, and state smoke-free laws, changes in average state cigarette pack price, and smoking cessation among smokers. I then interact labor force status with smoke-free laws to assess whether the associations differ for retired versus employed respondents. Second, I estimate within-person fixed effects models to evaluate the association between the implementation of smoke-free laws, changes in average state cigarette pack price, and smoking intensity among smokers. Models were stratified by labor force status to assess whether the associations varied by labor force participation. All analyses were also stratified by age into younger (51-64) and older (65+) respondents. Neither the implementation of smoke-free laws nor increases in cigarette prices were associated with greater smoking cessation or lower smoking intensity. There was no evidence that labor force participation was associated with greater responsiveness to smoke-free laws. The results suggest that two of the most popular tobacco control policy tools in the US, smoke-free laws and cigarette prices, may be less effective among older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.