ArticleAtencion primaria2020
[Standardized nursing languages and care plans. Perception of use and utility in primary healthcare].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standardized nursing terminologies in primary care: a qualitative approach to the experience of nursing professionals.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Application of multimodal nanotechnology and standardized nursing management in ventricular arrhythmia.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- Nurse management of minor problems in primary care emergencies: a non-randomized controlled trial.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Perception of Pediatric Nurses on the Use of Standardized Nursing Handover Process in Intra-Hospital Patients Transfer: Attitudes, Barriers, and Practical Challenges.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Assessment of Standardized Care Plans for People with Chronic Diseases in Primary Care Settings.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Towards a set of competencies in palliative care nursing in Spain: what's getting in the way of consensus?BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Software for the care of people with cardiovascular risk: construction and evidence of validity.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2024Article
- Nursing Care Plan for a Newborn with the Defect of Congenital Gastroschisis in the Postoperative Period Using ICNPInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify opinions of Primary Healthcare nurses on the use and usefulness of standardised nursing care plans and traditional nursing language systems in the practice settings.
designMulticentre, observational, cross-sectional study.
settingPrimary Healthcare centres in Catalonia.
participantsSample size was estimated at 1,668 registered nurses. Consecutive sampling was applied.
interventionsOn-line survey containing questions on ease, usefulness, and use of nursing care plans and standardised nursing language systems. MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive statistics, including percentages, central tendency, and dispersion measures. Statistical significance was set at P≤.05.
resultsThe final analysis included 1,813 questionnaires. Participants stated that care plans have a medium added value, however their use is frequently incorrect. They stated to have a fair level of knowledge on traditional standardised nursing languages, and most were of the opinion that these languages are difficult to use in practice (81%) and not useful to represent nursing care provision and its outcomes (78%). Regardless of their education level and years of experience, the participants assessed as insufficient the clarity (P=.058), ease of use (P=.240), and usefulness (P=.039) of these language systems in practice.
conclusionsNurses say that urgent changes are required in the use of care plans. This includes changing the language systems, and improving data and information that positively impacts on the provision of nursing care, as well as to enhance the health outcomes of the individuals receiving Primary Healthcare services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.