Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32417080›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2020

Etiology of Microcephaly and Central Nervous System Defects during the Zika Epidemic in Colombia.

Romeo R Galang, Greace Alejandra Avila, Diana Valencia, Marcela Daza, Van T Tong, Antonio José Bermúdez, Suzanne M Gilboa, Angélica Rico, Jordan Cates, Oscar Pacheco and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Romeo R GalangDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: RGalang@cdc.gov.
Greace Alejandra AvilaDirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia.
Diana ValenciaDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Marcela DazaVysnova Partners, Research Division, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Van T TongDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Antonio José BermúdezDirección de Redes en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia.
Suzanne M GilboaDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Angélica RicoDirección de Redes en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia.
Jordan CatesDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Oscar PachecoDirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia.
Christina M WinfieldDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Franklyn PrietoDirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia.
Margaret A HoneinDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Liliana J CortésDirección de Vigilancia y Análisis de Riesgo en Salud Pública, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia.
Cynthia A MooreDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Martha L OspinaDirección General, Instituto Nacional de Salud, Bogotá, Distrito Capital, Colombia.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of microcephaly and central nervous system (CNS) defects during the Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic in Colombia and proportion attributable to congenital ZIKV infection. STUDY

designClinical and laboratory data for cases of microcephaly and/or CNS defects reported to national surveillance between 2015 and 2017 were reviewed and classified by a panel of clinical subject matter experts. Maternal and fetal/infant biologic specimens were tested for congenital infection and chromosomal abnormalities. Infants/fetuses with microcephaly and/or CNS defects (cases) were classified into broad etiologic categories (teratogenic, genetic, multifactorial, and unknown). Cases classified as potentially attributable to congenital ZIKV infection were stratified by strength of evidence for ZIKV etiology (strong, moderate, or limited) using a novel strategy considering birth defects unique or specific to ZIKV or other infections and laboratory evidence.

resultsAmong 858 reported cases with sufficient information supporting a diagnosis of microcephaly or CNS defects, 503 were classified as potentially attributable to congenital ZIKV infection. Of these, the strength of evidence was considered strong in 124 (24.7%) cases; moderate in 232 (46.1%) cases; and limited in 147 (29.2%). Of the remaining, 355 (41.4%) were attributed to etiologies other than ZIKV infection (syphilis, toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes 1 and herpes 2 viruses only, n = 32 [3.7%]; genetic, n = 16 [1.9%]; multifactorial, n = 42 [4.9%]; unknown, n = 265 [30.9%]).

conclusionsFifty-eight percent of cases of microcephaly and/or CNS defects were potentially attributable to congenital ZIKV infection; however, the strength of evidence varied considerably. This surveillance protocol might serve as a model approach for investigation and etiologic classification of complex congenital conditions.

Indexed as

Central Nervous SystemColombiaCongenital AbnormalitiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMicrocephalyPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrevalenceZika Virus Infectionbirth defectscongenital infectionepidemicsurveillance

Identifiers

PMID32417080
PMCPMC7321917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.