Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32416849›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Effect of galactooligosaccharides delivered in ovo on meat quality traits of broiler chickens exposed to heat stress.

S Tavaniello, A Slawinska, D Prioriello, V Petrecca, M Bertocchi, M Zampiga, G Salvatori, G Maiorano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Physiological effects ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Non-Antibiotics Strategies to ControlAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  17. Epigenetic changes in poultry due to reprogramming of the gut microbiota.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S TavanielloDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy. Electronic address: siria.tavaniello@unimol.it.
A SlawinskaDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; Department of Animal Biotechnology and Genetics, UTP University of Science and Technology, 85-084 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
D PriorielloDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
V PetreccaDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
M BertocchiDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy; Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064 Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
M ZampigaDepartment of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, 40064 Ozzano dell'Emilia, Italy.
G SalvatoriDepartment of Medicine and Health Science, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
G MaioranoDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A study was carried out to evaluate meat quality traits in fast-growing chickens stimulated in ovo with trans-galactoolighosaccarides (GOS) and exposed to heat stress. On day 12 of egg incubation, 3,000 fertilized eggs (Ross 308) were divided into prebiotic group (GOS) injected with 3.5 mg GOS/egg, saline group (S) injected with physiological saline, and control group (C) uninjected. After hatching, 900 male chicks (300 chicks/treatment) were reared in floor pens in either thermoneutral (TN; 6 pens/group, 25 birds/pen) or heat stress conditions (HS, 30°C from 32 to 42 D; 6 pens/group, 25 birds/pen). At 42 D of age, 15 randomly chosen birds/treatment/temperature were slaughtered and the pectoral muscle (PM) was removed for analyses. Data were analyzed by GLM in a 3 × 2 factorial design. In ovo treatment had no effect on PM weight, pH, water-holding capacity, and shear force. GOS and S birds had lighter (L*, P < 0.01) PM than C group, whereas the latter showed a higher (P < 0.05) yellowness index (b*) compared to S group. Proximate composition, cholesterol, and intramuscular collagen properties were not affected by treatment. As for fatty acid composition, only total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) content and n-6 PUFA were slightly lower in GOS group compared to S. Heat stress had a detrimental effect on PM weight (P < 0.01) and increased meat pH (P < 0.01). PM from HS chickens was darker with a higher b* index (P < 0.05) and had a higher (P < 0.01) lipid content and a lower (P < 0.05) total collagen amount. Total saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), and PUFA were similar among groups. Significant interactions between factors were found for fatty acid composition: GOS decreased (P < 0.01) SFA and increased (P < 0.05) MUFA contents in HS birds. In conclusion, in ovo injection of GOS could mitigate the detrimental effect of heat stress on some meat quality traits.

Indexed as

ChickensAnimalsHeat-Shock ResponseInjectionsMaleMeatOligosaccharidesOvumPrebioticsRandom AllocationOligosaccharidesPrebioticsfatty acidsgalactooligosaccharidesheat stressin ovo injectionmeat quality

Identifiers

PMID32416849
PMCPMC7587659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.