Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32416839›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Antimicrobial peptide presenting potential strain-specific real time polymerase chain reaction assay for detecting the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5 in chicken intestine.

S Sobanbua, S Dolkittikul, M Nakphaichit, S Keawsompong, S Nitisinprasert

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anti-inflammatory Effect of ProbioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbiome Analysis Reveals the Attenuation Effect ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S SobanbuaSpecialized Research Unit: Prebiotics and Probiotics for Health, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Lat Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
S DolkittikulSpecialized Research Unit: Prebiotics and Probiotics for Health, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Lat Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
M NakphaichitSpecialized Research Unit: Prebiotics and Probiotics for Health, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Lat Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand; Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food (CASAF), Kasetsart University Institute for Advanced Studies (NRU-KU), Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
S KeawsompongSpecialized Research Unit: Prebiotics and Probiotics for Health, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Lat Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand; Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food (CASAF), Kasetsart University Institute for Advanced Studies (NRU-KU), Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
S NitisinprasertSpecialized Research Unit: Prebiotics and Probiotics for Health, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University, Lat Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand; Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food (CASAF), Kasetsart University Institute for Advanced Studies (NRU-KU), Kasetsart University, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand. Electronic address: fagisnn@ku.ac.th.
Kasetsart University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gene coding for antimicrobial peptides produced by probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5 located on the cloned DNA fragment I-C46 containing 2 open reading frames I-C46-F2.1 and I-C46-F2.2 were designed for strain-specific primers P1 and P2, respectively, and assessed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. According to the obtained results, primer P1 has limited strain specificity. Primer P2 exhibited high efficacy and specificity at annealing temperature of 70°C while P1 annealed at 57°C causing nonspecific bands. Hence, P2 was selected for quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay by isothermal annealing and extension reaction at high temperature of 70°C resulting in linearity for its DNA sequences ranging from 10

Indexed as

AnimalsChickensIntestinesLimosilactobacillus reuteriPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsProbioticsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionPore Forming Cytotoxic Proteinsantimicrobial peptideLactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5quantitative polymerase chain reactionstrain-specific primer

Identifiers

PMID32416839
PMCPMC7587613
OpenAlexW2976340415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.