Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32416829›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2020

Dietary zinc source impacts intestinal morphology and oxidative stress in young broilers.

Annatachja De Grande, Saskia Leleu, Evelyne Delezie, Christof Rapp, Stefaan De Smet, Evy Goossens, Freddy Haesebrouck, Filip Van Immerseel, Richard Ducatelle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sheep-DerivedMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Annatachja De GrandeDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium; Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, B-9090 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Saskia LeleuResearch Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, B-9090 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Evelyne DelezieResearch Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, B-9090 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Christof RappZinpro Corporation, 5831 PJ Boxmeer, The Netherlands.
Stefaan De SmetDepartment of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Ghent University, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Evy GoossensDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Freddy HaesebrouckDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Filip Van ImmerseelDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium. Electronic address: Filip.VanImmerseel@UGent.be.
Richard DucatelleDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zinc is an essential nutritional trace element for all forms of life as it plays an important role in numerous biological processes. In poultry, zinc is provided by in-feed supplementation, mainly as zinc oxide or zinc sulfate. Alternatively zinc can be supplemented as organic sources, which are characterized by using an organic ligand that may be an amino acid, peptide, or protein to bind zinc and have a higher bioavailability than inorganic zinc sources. There are limited number of studies directly comparing the effects of inorganic vs. organic zinc sources on performance and intestinal health in broilers. Therefore, a digestibility and a performance study were conducted to evaluate and compare the effect of an amino acid-complexed zinc source vs. an inorganic zinc source on intestinal health. The experiment consisted of 2 treatments: either a zinc amino acid complex or zinc sulfate was added to a wheat-rye based diet at 60 ppm Zn, with 10 replicates (34 broilers per pen) per treatment. Effects on performance, intestinal morphology, microbiota composition, and oxidative stress were measured. Supplementing zinc amino acid complexes improved the zinc digestibility coefficient as compared to supplementation with zinc sulfate. Broilers supplemented with zinc amino acid complexes had a significantly lower feed conversion ratio in the starter phase compared to birds supplemented with zinc sulfate

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsChickensDietDietary SupplementsDose-Response Relationship, DrugIntestinesMaleOxidative StressRandom AllocationZincZincbroilerintestinal morphologymicrobiotaoxidative stresszinc amino acid complex

Identifiers

PMID32416829
PMCPMC7587869
OpenAlexW2982694498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.