Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32416714›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Awareness, attitudes, barriers, and knowledge about evidence-based medicine among family physicians in Croatia: a cross-sectional study.

Danijel Nejašmić, Davorka Vrdoljak, Valerija Bralić Lang, Josip Anđelo Borovac, Ana Marušić

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danijel NejašmićDepartment of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, 21000, Split, Croatia. danijel.nejasmic@mefst.hr.
Davorka VrdoljakCochrane Croatia, University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, Croatia.
Valerija Bralić LangDepartment of Family Medicine, Zagreb University School of Medicine, School of Public Health 'Andrija Štampar', Rockefellerova 4, Zagreb, Croatia.
Josip Anđelo BorovacDepartment of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, Croatia.
Ana MarušićCochrane Croatia, University of Split School of Medicine, Šoltanska 2, Split, Croatia.
University of Split · HRAndrija Stampar Teaching Institute of Public Health · HR

Funding

Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost IP-2014-09-7672Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost (HR) IP-2019-04-4882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based medicine (EBM) aims to assist physicians in making medical decisions based on the integration of the current best evidence, clinical expertise, and patients' values. Extensive research has been conducted regarding physicians' awareness, attitudes, barriers, and knowledge about EBM. In Croatia, there is a lack of research on this topic, especially among family physicians (FP). The aim of this study was to assess the awareness, attitudes, barriers, and knowledge about EBM among FPs in Croatia after six years of educational activities organized and provided by Cochrane Croatia.

methodsIn a cross-sectional study, conducted in 2016, we offered to FPs in Croatia a printed or online validated questionnaire to assess attitudes toward and barriers when considering the use of EBM, awareness about sources of evidence, and their level of understanding of evidence-based medicine terminology. The physicians were approached during mandatory continuing medical education courses and through their professional associations. We compared results from two groups of physicians, one with family medicine specialization and the other without.

results295 (14%) of all officially registered FPs responded to the questionnaire. Respondents were very positive toward the promotion and usage of EBM. 160 (67%) indicated that they did not have access to the Cochrane Library. The majority reported lack of time available for finding evidence (80%), and patients' unrealistic expectations that influence doctors' choice of treatment (72%). Between the two groups of physicians, more family medicine specialists reported time restrictions for finding evidence. The highest level of EBM terminology understanding was reported for study design terms, and the lowest for statistical terms.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that FPs in Croatia had very positive attitudes toward the use of EBM, they agreed that EBM improves patient care, and they estimated that more than two thirds of their practice is EBM-based. Compared to the results of the first assessment of physicians in 2010, there was some increase in the level of EBM awareness among FPs. However, to further increase the quality of EBM practice in Croatia better access to EBM sources and further educational activities are needed.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, ContinuingEvidence-Based MedicineFamily PracticeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical Decision-MakingCroatiaCross-Sectional StudiesEducational MeasurementHumansNeeds AssessmentPhysicians, FamilySurveys and QuestionnairesAwarenessEducationEvidence-based medicineFamily physiciansQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID32416714
PMCPMC7231414
OpenAlexW3026265686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.