Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2020
Ivosidenib in IDH1-mutant, chemotherapy-refractory cholangiocarcinoma (ClarIDHy): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 629 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Study of AG-120 in Previously-treated Subjects With Nonresectable or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma With an IDH1 Mutation
Anlotinib Plus Nab-Paclitaxels and S-1 Versus FOLFOX for Patients with Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer As Second-Line Treatment: a Phase 2/3, Multi-centric Double-stage Randomized Controlled Trial
Role of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Genetic Profiling and Clinical Outcomes for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC) Patients - A Multicenter, Prospective, Observational Epidemiology Study
Role of Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) in Genetic Profiling and Clinical Outcomes for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer (BTC) Patients - Prospective, Observational, Epidemiology Study
Who cites it
629 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,025 citations in OpenAlex.
- First-Line Chemotherapy Regimens for Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- Comparison of second-line chemotherapy regimens in advanced biliary tract cancer: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and population-based cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer: a meta-analysis of and sequential analysis of trials.Hepatology international · 2025Pooled it
- Metabolomics and metabolites in cancer diagnosis and treatment.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Pooled it
- Second-Line Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: A Meta-analysis Based on Individual Patient-Level Data of Randomized Trials.Cancer research and treatment · 2025Pooled it
- Next-generation sequencing for guiding matched targeted therapies in people with relapsed or metastatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder cancer: Post-hoc analysis of the ABC-01, -02 and -03 clinical trials.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Clinical and translational study of ivosidenib plus nivolumab in advanced solid tumors harboring IDH1 mutations.The oncologist · 2025Trial
- Sunitinib as Second-Line Treatment in Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Results From the SUN-CK GERCOR Phase II Trial.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Trial
- Assessment of heterogeneity according to hospital or medical experience factors in outcomes of chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: a post-hoc analysis of JCOG1113.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy With or Without Bevacizumab in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer: Clinical and Biomarker Data From the Randomized Phase II IMbrave151 Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Trial
- Long-term outcomes in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Trial
- An unresectable cholangiolocarcinoma diagnosed by integrating biopsy-based histopathology and genomic findings with clinical and imaging data.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Assessment of MRD and Longitudinal Monitoring of Post-Surgery Biliary Tract Cancer With a Customized ctDNA Panel.Cancer science · 2026Article
- EORTC-1607-GITCG/ABC-09: Open-label first-line, single-arm phase II study of CisGem combined with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Evolving precision: Updates in targeted therapy for cholangiocarcinoma.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2026Review
569 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
26 authors at 20 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIsocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations occur in approximately 13% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, a relatively uncommon cancer with a poor clinical outcome. The aim of this international phase 3 study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ivosidenib (AG-120)-a small-molecule targeted inhibitor of mutated IDH1-in patients with previously treated IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma.
methodsThis multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study included patients from 49 hospitals in six countries aged at least 18 years with histologically confirmed, advanced, IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma who had progressed on previous therapy, and had up to two previous treatment regimens for advanced disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 or 1, and a measurable lesion as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with a block size of 6 and stratified by number of previous systemic treatment regimens for advanced disease to oral ivosidenib 500 mg or matched placebo once daily in continuous 28-day cycles, by means of an interactive web-based response system. Placebo to ivosidenib crossover was permitted on radiological progression per investigator assessment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival by independent central review. The intention-to-treat population was used for the primary efficacy analyses. Safety was assessed in all patients who had received at least one dose of ivosidenib or placebo. Enrolment is complete; this study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02989857.
findingsBetween Feb 20, 2017, and Jan 31, 2019, 230 patients were assessed for eligibility, and as of the Jan 31, 2019 data cutoff date, 185 patients were randomly assigned to ivosidenib (n=124) or placebo (n=61). Median follow-up for progression-free survival was 6·9 months (IQR 2·8-10·9). Progression-free survival was significantly improved with ivosidenib compared with placebo (median 2·7 months [95% CI 1·6-4·2] vs 1·4 months [1·4-1·6]; hazard ratio 0·37; 95% CI 0·25-0·54; one-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse event in both treatment groups was ascites (four [7%] of 59 patients receiving placebo and nine [7%] of 121 patients receiving ivosidenib). Serious adverse events were reported in 36 (30%) of 121 patients receiving ivosidenib and 13 (22%) of 59 patients receiving placebo. There were no treatment-related deaths.
interpretationProgression-free survival was significantly improved with ivosidenib compared with placebo, and ivosidenib was well tolerated. This study shows the clinical benefit of targeting IDH1 mutations in advanced, IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma.
fundingAgios Pharmaceuticals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.