Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32416033›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2020

Integrating genomics into conservation management.

Emily K Latch

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emily K LatchBehavioral and Molecular Ecology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9892-1056

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Captive populations play a vital role in conservation, supporting both in situ and ex situ conservation projects. A healthy, self-sustaining captive population serves as valuable insurance against extinctions and a source of individuals for reintroduction into the wild. Genetic and genomic data can advance conservation and management across a range of scenarios. Although expanding, genomic data do not exist for most captive populations and there remain few examples of how these data can be integrated directly into conservation efforts. In this issue of Molecular Ecology Resources, Humble et al. (2020) present a chromosomal-level genome assembly for the extinct-in-the-wild scimitar-horned oryx (Oryx dammah), and resequencing data to survey genetic variation across captive populations. These data are exciting for reintroduction planning by offering guidance for selecting source populations to maximize global genetic variation and valuable resources for effective post-release monitoring. The genomic resources generated also are valuable tools with the power to yield novel and important insights into the evolution of scimitar-horned oryx and other antelope species.

Indexed as

AntelopesGenomicsAnimalsGenomeHumansbioinfomatics/phyloinfomaticscaptive populationsconservation geneticsgenomics/proteomicswildlife management

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.