Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32415849›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2020

Social Support and Antibody Responses to Vaccination: A Meta-Analysis.

Bert N Uchino, Joshua Landvatter, Katherine Zee, Niall Bolger

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Social connection as a critical factor for mental and physical health: evidence, trends, challenges, and future implications.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Psychology Meets Biology in COVID-19: What We Know and Why It Matters for Public Health.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bert N UchinoDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Joshua LandvatterDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Katherine ZeeDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY.
Niall BolgerDepartment of Psychology, Columbia University, Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY.
Columbia University · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Understanding Relationship Ambivalence and its Links to Cardiovascular HealthR01HL137606 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI UCHINO, BERT N. · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
Social Relationships and Cardiovascular Health: An Examination of MechanismsR01HL085106 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI UCHINO, BERT N. · 2007 to 2009
$1.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL085106NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL137606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial support and social integration have been linked to lower rates of morbidity and mortality. However, the biological mechanisms responsible for such links need greater attention. Vaccine paradigms provide an integrative window into immune system involvement in the protective influence of social support/integration. PURPOSE: The main aim of this article was to conduct a meta-analytic review of the association between social support/social integration and antibody responses to vaccines. Exploratory analyses also examined effect sizes and confidence intervals as a function of several factors to inform future research.

methodA literature search was conducted using the ancestry approach and with PsycInfo, Medline, and the Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection by crossing the exact keywords of social support or social integration with vaccine or antibodies. The review identified nine studies with a total of 672 participants.

resultsThe omnibus meta-analysis showed that social support/social integration was related to higher antibody levels following vaccination, but the average effect size was small and the lower bound of the confidence interval included zero (Zr = 0.06 [-.04, .15]). These results did not appear to differ much as a function of the operationalization of social relationships, participant age, or follow-up period, although effect sizes appeared larger for studies using a primary antigen.

conclusionsThese data provide some evidence that social support may be linked to antibody responses to vaccines. However, effect sizes are mostly small and zero overall effect cannot be ruled out. Future studies would benefit from larger sample sizes and greater consideration of methodological issues associated with secondary immune responses to antigen.

Indexed as

Social IntegrationSocial SupportVaccinationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibody FormationHumansMiddle AgedVaccinesYoung AdultVaccinesAntibody titersRelationshipsSocial supportVaccination

Identifiers

PMID32415849
PMCPMC7414291
OpenAlexW3025400426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.