Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32415641›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2020

Chromosome analysis of blastocysts derived from single pronuclear zygotes by array CGH and clinical outcomes by the transfer of single pronuclear zygotes.

Kimiko Hirata, Sakae Goto, Yoko Izumi, Misato Taguchi, Ayano Hayashi, Misono Fujioka, Akiko Ishiko, Keiko Nakanishi, Fuminori Kimura, Takashi Murakami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Could blastocysts derived from abnormal fertilized zygotes be used? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kimiko HirataGoto Ladies Clinic, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan. kwakai-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Sakae GotoGoto Ladies Clinic, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Yoko IzumiGoto Ladies Clinic, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Misato TaguchiGoto Ladies Clinic, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Ayano HayashiGoto Ladies Clinic, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Misono FujiokaGoto Ladies Clinic, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Akiko IshikoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Keiko NakanishiGoto Ladies Clinic, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.
Fuminori KimuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Takashi MurakamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to explore the aneuploidy of blastocysts derived from single pronuclear (1PN) zygotes, almost 75% of which were regarded as diploid, using array CGH and examine the pregnancy outcomes.

methodsEmbryonic aneuploidy screening of sixteen embryos from 1PN zygotes and sixteen embryos from 2PN zygotes was performed using array CGH in study 1. In addition, the reproductive outcome of 1761 single blastocysts, after untested frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in IVF/ICSI patients, was retrospectively analyzed and compared between the 1PN and 2PN groups in study 2.

resultsThe aneuploidy rates were 30.8% (4/13) in 1PN IVF, 33.3% (1/3) in 1PN ICSI, 46.2% (6/13) in 2PN IVF, and 100% (3/3) in 2PN ICSI. The 1PN group achieved clinical pregnancy in 25.0% (7/28) of IVF and 30.0% (3/10) of ICSI, whereas these rates in the 2PN control group were 44.6% (557/1250) of IVF and 37.4% (177/473) of ICSI. No miscarriage occurred in the pregnancies from 1PN zygotes, whereas the rates of miscarriage in the 2PN control group were 22.6% (126/557) in IVF and 22.2% (39/176) in ICSI. The delivery rate was similar in all groups. Ten deliveries in the 1PN group showed no newborn malformation.

conclusionWithin the limits of the small sample size, our results suggest that the aneuploidy and delivery rates of the blastocysts derived from 1PN zygotes are the same as those derived from 2PN zygotes. Blastocysts derived from 1PN zygotes may be used clinically and could increase the chance of pregnancy.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsAdultAneuploidyBlastocystComparative Genomic HybridizationCryopreservationFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSingle Embryo TransferSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicZygoteArray CGHChromosome analysisEmbryonic aneuploidySingle pronuclear zygotes

Identifiers

PMID32415641
PMCPMC7376778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.