Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32415553›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2020

Age-related changes in mechanical properties of human abdominal fascia.

Miglena Kirilova-Doneva, Dessislava Pashkouleva, Stoyan Stoytchev

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miglena Kirilova-DonevaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, 2 Dunav Str., 1000, Sofia, Bulgaria. miglena_doneva@abv.bg.
Dessislava PashkoulevaInstitute of Mechanics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 4, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Stoyan StoytchevInstitute of Mechanics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., Bl. 4, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Institute of Mechanics · BGMedical University of Sofia · BG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess and model age-related changes in the mechanical properties of human fascia. The samples were divided into three age groups: group A-up to 60 years (mean age 52.5 ± 6 years), group B-61-80 years (mean age 70.4 ± 5.2 years), and group C-81-90 years (mean age 83.2 ± 2 years). A uniaxial tensile test was applied to fascia specimens cut perpendicular and parallel to fibers. The secant modulus at 5% strain, the maximum stress, and the stretch at maximum stress were calculated from the stress-stretch ratio curves. The results indicated an increase in the secant modulus with the increased age. The trend is clearer in the longitudinal direction. Considering the strain energy function which accounts the isotropic and non-isotropic response of the fascia where isotropic and anisotropic parts are split, we evaluated which material model is the most suitable to present isotropic mechanical behavior of the tissue. The experimental stress-stretch ratio curves were approximated using Mooney-Rivlin, Yeoh, and neo-Hookean strain energy functions and a good match between theoretical and experimental results was obtained. On the basis of objective function values and normalized mean square root error, we recommend using the Yeoh model to describe the isotropic mechanical behavior of human abdominal fascia. Graphical abstract .

Indexed as

AbdomenAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBiomechanical PhenomenaFasciaHumansMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalExperimental dataHuman abdominal fasciaMechanical propertiesStrain energy function

Identifiers

PMID32415553
OpenAlexW3025256739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.